【阿摩網站-置頂欄顏色票選問卷】只要填寫就能獲得500Y，結束時間 2024/04/25 11:59:59。 前往查看

郵局◆英文題庫下載題庫

上一題
If you love nature and the wilderness, you may have a hard time seeing organic farms and solar energy as environmental dangers. But that is the position of some hard greens. Hard greens argue that mainstream environmentalists often promote policies that hurt the planet. Hard greens say that if you want to save the wilderness and protect endangered species, you have to move people off the land and concentrate them in cities. They argue that the pollution produced by large cities and their close suburbs does less danger to the planet and its wild life than the forests that are cut down for farmland, country homes and suburban development. When an organic farmer clears land of trees and bushes to plant fields of organic vegetables, the natural habitat of wild vegetation and animals is destroyed-even if the farmer isn’t using pesticides. Put another way, hard greens would say that you have to reduce man’s footprint on the earth. Here are some positions of “hard greens:” Except in unforested areas that receive a great deal of sun, widespread use of solar energy will seriously damage the environment. In order to produce enough solar energy to provide power to New York City, for example, almost all the forests in the state of New York would have to be cut down to make room for solar cells. Food should be produced by large agribusiness corporations rather than small family farmers. Large corporate farms are more efficient than small farms and produce more food on less land. Organic farming and pesticide-free farm products should be discouraged because they are inefficient. When pesticides are not used, more land must be cleared to produce the same amount of food.
【題組】 47. What do hard greens think about having people live in large cities and having them move to country homes4 
(A) More people should move to the country in order to reduce pollution. 
(B) More people should move to the suburbs to plant fields of organic vegetables. 
(C) People should live in the cities so as to save cost on transportation and save energy. 
(D) People should live in the cities so forests and wild life in the country may be saved.

答案：D
難度： 適中
最佳解!
角胡麻 大二上 (2017/03/30)
wildernessn(n.) 荒野environmentalist(n.) 環境問題專家，環境保護主義者endangered(a.) 瀕臨絕種的habitat (n.) (動物的)棲息地；(植物的)產地pesticide(n.) 殺蟲劑agribusiness (n.) 農業綜合企業They argue that the pollution produce.....觀看完整全文，請先登入
2F
業精於勤，事立於豫 研一下 (2018/02/13)

What do hard greens think about having people live in large cities and having them move to country homes? (hard greens 對於人們應該住在大城市或搬到鄉村居住有什麼想法？)

(A) More people should move to the country in order to reduce pollution. (為了減少污染，更多的人應該搬到鄉村。)

(B) More people should move to the suburbs to plant fields of organic vegetables. (為了種植有機蔬菜，更多的人應該搬到郊區。)

(C) People should live in the cities so as to save cost on transportation and save energy. (為了節省通勤成本及體力，人們應該住在城市。)

(D) People should live in the cities so forests and wild life...


查看完整內容
3F
hchungw 研一上 (2020/12/04)

pollution produced by large cities and their close suburbs does less danger to the planet and its wild life than the forests that are cut down for farmland, country homes and suburban development.

與被砍伐的農田，鄉村房屋和郊區發展所砍伐的森林相比，大城市及其近郊產生的污染對地球及其野生生物的危害較小。


What do hard greens think about having people live in large cities and having them move to country homes4 (hard greens如何考慮讓人們生活在大城市中並搬到鄉間住宅)

(D) People should live in the cities so forests and wild life in the country may be saved.

（D）人們應居住在城市中，以便挽救該國的森林和野...


查看完整內容


If you love nature and the wilderness, y..-阿摩線上測驗