Passage #2 A prevailing phenomenon in the era of globalization is that many individuals develop a
flexible notion of citizenship as strategies to accumulate capital and power. Many scholars
identify the phenomenon as “flexible citizenship,” which refers to the cultural logics of
capitalist accumulation, transnational travel, and displacement that induce people to respond
fluidly and opportunistically to political, economic and social changes. In their quest to
accumulate capital and prestige in the global arena, these transnational subjects stress, and are
regulated by, practices favoring flexibility, mobility, and repositioning in relation to markets,
governments and cultural regimes. These logics and practices are produced within particular
structures of meaning about family, gender, nationality, class mobility, and social power.
Flexibility and mobility enable the transnational subjects to construct a new mode of
identity across political borders. To illustrate, transnational subjects include figures such as
multicultural professionals, multiple-passport holders, the “astronauts” shuttling across
borders on business, or “parachute kids” dropped off by parents on the trans-Pacific
business commute. The individuals who are able to benefit from their participation in global
capitalism mostly celebrate flexibility and mobility. Today, as mobility and flexibility form an
integral part of human behavioral patterns, the new connections between flexibility and the
logics of displacement, on the one hand, and capital accumulation, on the other, have given
new valence to the strategies of maneuvering and positioning. Flexibility, migration and
relocation, instead of being coerced or resisted, have become fashionable practices.
【題組】40. What might be the author’s attitude toward “flexibility and mobility” in the era of
globalization?
(A) satirical
(B) affirmative
(C) skeptical
(D) pessimistic
(E) indecisive