29.

(A) expectation.

(B) experience.

(C) education.

(D) exception.

25. (A) infiltrate. (B) interprete. (C) implore. (D) insinuate. After the mass gun murders at Virginia Tech, I wrote about the unfathomable image of cell phones ringing in the pockets of the dead kids, and of the parents trying (26) to reach them. And I said (as did many others), This will go on, if no one stops it, in this manner and to this degree in this country alone—alone among all the industrialized, wealthy, and so-called (27) countries in the world. There would be another, for certain. Then there were—many more, in fact—and when the latest and worst one happened, in Aurora, I (and many others) said, this time in a tone of despair, that nothing had changed. And I (and many others) predicted that it would happen again, soon. And that once again, the same twisted voices would say, Oh, this had nothing to do with gun laws or the misuse of the Second (28) or anything except some singular madman, of whom America for some reason seems to have a particularly dense sample. And now it has happened again, bang, like clockwork, one might say: Twenty dead children— babies, really—in a kindergarten in a prosperous town in Connecticut. And a mother screaming. And twenty families told that their grade-schooler had died. After the Aurora killings, I did a few debates with advocates for the child-killing lobby—sorry, the gun lobby—and, without (29) and with a mad vehemence, they told the same old lies: it doesn't happen here more often than elsewhere (yes, it does); more people are protected by guns than killed by them (no, they aren't—that's a flat-out fabrication); guns don't kill people, people do; and all the other perverted lies that people who can only be called knowing (30) to murder continue to repeat, people who are in their own way every bit as twisted and crazy as the killers whom they defend. (That they are often the same people who pretend outrage at the loss of a single embryo only makes the craziness still crazier.)

26. (A) disppointedly. (B) disinterestedly. (C) desperately. (D) demotedly.

27. (A) civilized. (B) barbarian. (C) infrastrctural. (D) courteous.

28. (A) Appointment. (B) Astonishment. (C) Amazement. (D) Amendment.

30. (A) accessories. (B) accomodations. (C) accentuations. (D) accounts. Reading Comprehension 40% Read the passages and choose the best answer for each of the questions. Every so often in "Top Gun: Maverick," Pete Mitchell (that's Maverick) is summoned to a face- to-face with an admiral. Pete, after all these years in the Navy more than 35, but who's counting - has stalled at the rank of captain. He's one of the best fighter pilots ever to take wing, but the U.S. military hierarchy can be a treacherous political business, and Maverick is anything but a politician. In the presence of a superior officer he is apt to salute, smirk and push his career into the middle of the table like a stack of poker chips. He's all in. Always. The first such meeting is with Rear Adm. Chester Cain, a weathered chunk of brass played by Ed Harris, who has an impressive in-movie flight record of his own. (Without "The Right Stuff," there would have been no "Top Gun.") He seems to be telling Pete that the game is over. Thanks to new technology, flyboys like him are all but obsolete. Based on this scene, you might think that the movie is setting out to be a meditation on American air power in the age of drone warfare, but that will have to wait for the next sequel. Pete still has a job to do. A teaching job, officially, but we'll get to that. The conversation with Cain is not so much a 35 herring as a meta-commentary. Pete, as I'm sure I don't have to tell you, is the avatar of Tom Cruise, and the central question posed by this movie has less to do with the necessity of combat pilots than with the relevance of movie stars. With all this cool new technology at hand - you can binge 37 episodes of Silicon Valley grifting without leaving your couch - do we really need guys, or movies, like this?

31. According to this review, why is the most likely reason that Pete Mitchell never got promoted? (A) He is too good a pilot. (B) He has served thirty five years in the Navy. (C) He is timid and cowardly. (D) He does not defer to his superiors.

32. What does "all but obsolete" mean? (A) absolutely obsolete. (B) quite obsolete. (C) a bit obsolete. (D) not at all obsolete.

33. According to this review, is this film about drone warfare? (A) yes. (B) no. (C) yes and no. (D) never specified.

34. What does the author say that the scene with Cain is a "meta-commentary"? (A) It is a commentary about airfights. (B) It is a commentary about movie business. (C) It is a commentary about military careers. (D) All of the above.

35. Choose the adjective that best fills the blank. (A) yellow. (B) blue. (C) red. (D) purple. Aristotle thought that the value or worth of a human being — his virtue — was something that he acquired in growing up. It follows that people who can't (women, slaves) or simply don't (manual laborers) acquire that virtue have no grounds for demanding equal respect or recognition with those who do. As I read him, Aristotle not only did not believe in the conception of intrinsic human dignity that grounds our modern commitment to human rights, he has a philosophy that cannot be squared with it. Aristotle's inegalitarianism is less like Kant and Hume's racism and more like Descartes's views on nonhuman animals: The fact that Descartes characterizes nonhuman animals as soulless automata is a direct consequence of his rationalist dualism. His comments on animals cannot be treated as "stray remarks." If cancellation is removal from a position of prominence on the basis of an ideological crime, it might appear that there is a case to be made for canceling Aristotle. He has much prominence: Thousands of years after his death, his ethical works continue to be taught as part of the basic philosophy curriculum offered in colleges and universities around the world. And Aristotle's mistake was serious enough that he comes off badly even when compared to the various "bad guys" of history who sought to justify the exclusion of certain groups — women, Black people, Jews, gays, atheists — from the sheltering umbrella of human dignity. Because Aristotle went so far as to think there was no umbrella.