37 In an American court of law, who decides whether a defendant is guilty or not?

(A)The judge 
(B)The State 
(C)The jury 
(D)The lawyers

答案:登入後查看
統計: A(53), B(55), C(306), D(14), E(0) #338570

詳解 (共 2 筆)

#313037
民事和刑事法院的案件無論是在美國被稱為陪審團判決陪審團個人通常有很少沒有法律培訓總人口成員這樣的陪審團重視,因為它提供了一個同儕審判準備審理一宗法庭案件陪審團必須了解無罪推定舉證責任法律審判之前陪審員宣讀解釋如下作為一個無辜的人被告進入法庭直到國家說服超越合理懷疑必須考慮到他是一個無辜的人他是有罪的每一個被指控的罪行元素之後,如果所有的證據和論據你有合理懷疑被告犯有任何罪行的元素一個或更多,那麼你一定要找到他不認罪
確定國家是否超越合理懷疑證明被告有罪陪審團成員應遵循只能通過對證據全面公正的評價陪審員不應影響自己的個人偏見或同情
8
1
#3635111

In both civil民事的 and criminal court cases in the United States, a jury陪審團 is called to give a verdict判決.

The jury is made up of members of the general一般 population—individuals who typically have little or no legal法律的 training.

Such a jury is valued重要、有價值的 because it offers a trial審判 by one’s peers同輩、同等社會地位或能力.

In preparation預備、準備工作 for hearing a court case, a jury must understand the presumption推測 of innocence and the burden of proof舉證責任.

Before a legal trial, an explanation解釋 is read to jurors, as follows: “The defendant enters this courtroom as an innocent person, and you must consider him to be an innocent person until the State 國家、政府 convinces確信 you beyond a reasonable doubt排除合理懷疑 that he is guilty of every element要素 of the alleged被指控 offense. If, after all the evidence and arguments論點, you have a reasonable doubt as to the defendant’s having committed any one or more of the elements of the offense, then you must find him not guilty.”

In determining決定 whether or not the State has proven the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, jury members should be guided only by a full and fair evaluation評估 of the evidence. Jurors should not be influenced by their own personal bias偏袒 or sympathy.

5db2415f9cc0a.jpg 

 

In an American court of law, who decides whether a defendant is guilty or not?

(A)The judge  (B)The State  (C)The jury  (D)The lawyers


3
0