阿摩線上測驗
37 When I asked my nephew to stop texting under the table, my sister snapped at me not to _____ her child.
(A) describle
(B) discipline
(C) deploy
(D) demand
統計： A(36), B(282), C(53), D(143), E(0) #1151211
詳解 (共 10 筆)
(A) describe 描述/描寫/描繪
(B) discipline 訓導/訓練/紀律/約束
(C) deploy 有效運用/發揮…的作用
(D) demand 堅決請求/強烈要求/強要
nephew 侄子/外甥
snap 突然折斷/哢嚓一聲折斷
37 When I asked my nephew to_____ stop texting under the table, my sister snapped at me not to her child. (A) describle (B) discipline (C) deploy (D) demand
原題目文法應該沒有錯誤才對。雖然分裂不定式口語可以。用來強調句意，以免意思不清。但正式的情況to not discipline下好像是錯誤 。(我個人是認為可以用)
且原句的意思應該也沒有問題。(這題有分裂不定詞和不分裂不定詞應該都可以，意思也不會難以理解。也說的通才對。)
前面是當我要求姪子時……，我的妹妹snapped at me not to discipline her child.
強調的是我，就是針對我不能去教訓她的小孩。
(可能會有隱藏是這樣，其它人沒有，只有我特別喜歡教訓她的小孩，所以要針對我說)
這題是用snapped at===>所以應該是針對我才對。當然也有可能平常大家都很喜歡教訓她的小孩，然後就暴發了把氣全出在我身上用snapped at而是指 to not discipline.
採分裂不定詞的話，是強調後面的動作。
snapped at me to not discipline her child.
這句是說 not discipline her child. 不要教訓她的小孩是重點。
並非針對我，而是公告 "教訓她的小孩"這件事 是不行的。(隱藏的意思是大概大家都很喜歡教訓她的小孩，所以要強調不要教訓她的小孩)
https://baike.baidu.com/item/%E5%88%86%E8%A3%82%E4%B8%8D%E5%AE%9A%E5%BC%8F/10274226
否定型不定詞則是在任何型態的不定詞前加「not」即可。
(我個人是認為該把分裂式不定詞列為正式文法，但目前好像還不是正式的文法。因為不用分裂式不定詞意思會模糊，下面就是找來的列子說明)
http://www.english.com.tw/modules/news/article.php?storyid=6474
To與原形動詞誓死相隨？
分裂不定式（split infinitive）是將副詞或其他詞語加插在to和原形動詞間，如 "to hardly see"。自19世紀起，分裂不定式開始在流行文化普及，例如美國膾炙人口的科幻電視劇《星空奇遇記》（Star Trek）的著名開場白，就正用上分裂不定式： "To boldly go where no man has gone before"（勇闖無人之境）。然而，語法學家普遍認為 "to" 和原形動詞早立下山盟海誓，誓死相隨。但現代英語文法詞典卻認為並無此例， 而且強制從 "to" 和原形動詞中抽出副詞，甚至會引來曲解。"I decided to gradually cut down my coffee consumption." 意思是「我決定逐步少喝點咖啡。」若硬要避免分裂不定式，將句子改寫為 "I gradually decided to cut down......"，「逐步」便是形容「決定」，並非原意所指的飲用咖啡量了。看來在to和原形動詞這對熱戀情侶之間，容納一些朋友亦未嘗不可。
正式的話應該是這樣，
http://www.ef.com.tw/english-guide/english-grammar/infinitive/
舉例
- I decided not to go to London.
- He asked me not to be late.
- I'd like you not to sing so loudly.
- I'd rather not eat meat.
- I might not come.
google後學校好像的確明文是教不能這樣用。(雖然是支持可以這樣用)
另外……解釋補充別人的看法(就當作可以這樣用的情況，因為平常都是這樣用…)
I was feeling lazy so I decided not to go to the wedding.
這句的意思是being not to go to the wedding的意思。
因為有其它的原因(先)，所以不去參加婚禮(不定詞表目的)(後)
To get back at him I decided to not go to his wedding.
這句是說 decide(先)to(不定詞，目的，動作發生在後) not go to his wedding.
所以意思是
我決定了(先)，接下來要達成不去達成他的婚禮的目的。
(以不去他的婚蘊禮為目標，所以有可能之前有打算要去，然後變成以不去為目標)是有可能，重點事實
實際上只有強調後面重點不達成，隱含意思就看大家如何解釋…
to not go 強調後面要發生的動作是目的。
==>所以會有下面網址的看法
https://forum.wordreference.com/threads/not-to-or-to-not.361674/
I decided not to go - this is the usual form.
I decided to not go - this turns the act of "not going" into something active, as though it requires some effort, some force of will, as opposed to "not to go" which is more passive, the absence of any activity.
Compare:
I was feeling lazy so I decided not to go to the wedding.
To get back at him I decided to not go to his wedding.
The difference is only subtle, but the second form seems to suggest that you were originally planning to go, or were expected to go, but now you're going to put some effort into doing the opposite of what was planned or expected.
當我要求我的姪子不要在桌底下發簡訊，我的妹妹卻怒氣沖沖地叫我不要教訓她的小孩。 才是原本題目的解釋。
空格位置錯了 morning