阿摩線上測驗 登入

申論題資訊

試卷:114年 - 114-1 國立臺南女子高級中學_教師甄選試題:英文科#126035
科目:教甄◆英文科
年份:114年
排序:0

申論題內容

VI. Curriculum Design 

 Based on the content and issue in the given passage, design a 4-period micro-course for TNGS Grade 11 high school students to sharpen their language skills and critical thinking abilities. Please specify your teaching objectives, course design, materials, and assessments.         With the rise of artificial intelligence (AI), many people believe that education should change dramatically. Since AI can quickly provide information and answer complex questions, some argue that memorizing facts is unnecessary. Instead, students should focus on critical thinking and problem-solving while leaving basic knowledge to AI. However, this perspective overlooks an important fact: human creativity and intelligence rely on knowledge. If we depend too much on AI for memory and thinking, we may become less intelligent and more vulnerable to misinformation.

    AI tools like ChatGPT can be useful for learning. They act as personal tutors and provide quick access to information. However, knowing where to find information is not enough. Studies in cognitive psychology show that knowledge helps us learn and think better. The American educator E. D. Hirsch argued that to use new information effectively, we must already have a strong foundation of knowledge. In other words, knowledge is like mental scaffolding that supports further learning and creativity. An example of this idea can be seen in England’s education reforms. Inspired by Hirsch’s views, the government introduced a “knowledge-rich” curriculum. Students are now required to memorize essential facts, such as multiplication tables. This method has helped improve England’s international education rankings, proving that memorization remains important even in the digital age.

    Some people question which facts should be memorized, but the key idea remains the same: a strong foundation of knowledge is necessary for deeper understanding. British education expert Nick Gibb also emphasized that even though we can “just Google it,” our ability to use information depends on what we already know. If we lack basic knowledge, we struggle to process and evaluate new information effectively. Moreover, AI reliance may weaken our ability to think. In his book The Shallows, Nicholas Carr explained that relying on the Internet as a substitute for memory can harm our ability to learn. Studies of London taxi drivers showed that their brains adapted and expanded as they memorized city maps. However, if we let AI store all our knowledge, our brains might not develop in the same way.       Daisy Christodoulou, author of Seven Myths About Education, also pointed out that human working memory has limits. When we encounter too much new information at once, we become overwhelmed, making it harder to learn. Studies show that people often forget information they find online because they assume they can always look it up again. This overreliance on technology can make us less capable learners. Some AI companies even suggest that people should “embrace forgetfulness” and trust machines to store knowledge. However, this could make us overly dependent on AI, weakening our cognitive abilities. Unlike calculators, which only assist with simple math, AI chatbots can perform a wide range of cognitive tasks. If students rely on AI for thinking, not just for retrieving facts, both memory and creativity may decline. Some studies even suggest that the steady rise in IQ scores, known as the “Flynn effect,” has started to slow down in some countries.

    Governments are still exploring how AI should be used in education. While AI can support learning, we should not abandon traditional knowledge-based education. In an age of misinformation, having a strong foundation of basic facts is more important than ever. Instead of replacing human memory, AI should be used as a tool to enhance learning while preserving our ability to think independently and creatively.

詳解 (共 1 筆)

詳解 提供者:Jeff Chen

4-Period Micro-Course Design: Language Skills and Critical Thinking

Teaching Objectives

  1. Improve Grade 11 students' ability to critically evaluate information, especially in the age of AI.

  2. Enhance students’ English language skills, including reading, writing, speaking, and comprehension.

  3. Foster independent thinking and creativity by emphasizing the importance of a knowledge foundation.

 

Course Design

Period 1: Understanding AI and Its Role in Education
  • Activities:

    • Discuss key concepts from the given passage (memorization vs reliance on AI).

    • Group discussions on how AI tools like ChatGPT influence learning.

  • Materials:

    • Excerpts from Nicholas Carr’s The Shallows.

    • Infographics explaining AI’s applications in education.

  • Outcomes:

    • Students will understand AI’s benefits and limitations.

Period 2: Knowledge as Mental Scaffolding
  • Activities:

    • Analyze E.D. Hirsch’s idea of a “knowledge-rich” curriculum.

    • Interactive exercise: memorizing basic facts (e.g., multiplication tables) and connecting them to real-world problems.

  • Materials:

    • Case studies from England's education reforms.

    • Multimedia resources on the impact of foundational knowledge.

  • Outcomes:

    • Students recognize how knowledge enhances creativity and problem-solving.

Period 3: Critical Thinking in the Age of Misinformation
  • Activities:

    • Case study analysis: examples of misinformation and its impact.

    • Debates: “Is memorization outdated in the AI era?”

  • Materials:

    • Examples of misinformation (e.g., news articles or social media posts).

    • Guidelines for evaluating information sources.

  • Outcomes:

    • Students improve their ability to critically analyze and validate information.

Period 4: Creative Application and Reflection
  • Activities:

    • Writing task: Compose a persuasive essay arguing for or against knowledge-based education.

    • Presentations: Groups share their views on AI and traditional education.

  • Materials:

    • Essay prompts related to the course theme.

    • Presentation guidelines and rubrics.

  • Outcomes:

    • Students demonstrate language mastery and critical thinking.

 

Assessments

  1. Participation: Students are evaluated based on their engagement in group discussions and debates (20%).

  2. Memorization Exercises: Short quizzes to assess their understanding of foundational knowledge (30%).

  3. Essay Writing: Individual assessment of argumentative and persuasive writing skills (30%).

  4. Group Presentation: Evaluation of collaboration, creativity, and critical analysis (20%).

 

Conclusion

This micro-course balances language skill development and critical thinking enhancement, adapting to both traditional and AI-driven learning environments. It underscores the value of foundational knowledge while preparing students to navigate the complexities of the digital age.