最新資料

注册安全工程师执业资格考试—《安全生产事故案例分析》

注册土木工程师执业资格考试—《基础考试》

注册土木工程师执业资格考试—《专业考试》

115年 - 115 關務特種考試_五等_輪機工程：輪機當值大意#138825(50題)

115年 - 115 關務特種考試_五等_輪機工程：輪機工程大意（包括柴油機大意與輔機大意）#138824(50題)

115年 - 115 身心障礙特種考試_三等_一般行政：政治學#138823(4題)

115年 - 115 身心障礙特種考試_三等_一般行政：公共政策#138822(4題)

115年 - 115 身心障礙特種考試_三等_一般行政：行政學#138821(27題)

115年 - 115 身心障礙特種考試_三等_勞工行政：勞工行政與勞工立法#138820(4題)

115年 - 115 身心障礙特種考試_三等_勞工行政：就業安全制度#138819(4題)

115年 - 115 關務特種考試_四等_紡織工程（選試英文）：紡織纖維學概要#138818(5題)

115年 - 115 關務特種考試_四等_關稅會計（選試英文）：會計審計法規概要（包括預算法、會計法、決算法與審計法）#138817(4題)

115年 - 115 關務特種考試_三等_藥事（選試英文）：藥劑學（包括生物藥劑學）#138816(4題)

40.衛星定位測量之原理為(A)角度前方交會 (B)角度後方交會 (C)距離前方交會(D)距離後方 交會。

39.GNSS全球導航定位系統除美國的GPS外，下列何者為非？(A)歐盟的GALILEO (B)日本的QZSS (C)中國大陸的BEIDOU (D)俄羅斯的GLONASS。

38.直接由GNSS測量之高程為(A)正高 (B)力高 (C)正常高 (D)椭球高。

4. 您認為鑄件產生氣孔之主要原因為何？

3. 試述機械造糢之優點。

2. 台灣鑄造產業未來發展趨勢為何？

高普考/公職/國考作文，高分寫作批改攻略！

講師：台中大雅家教-睿智數學及英文家教，王瑞志老師

簡介：提供高普考/公職/國考作文，高分寫作批改攻略！ #作文 #高普考作文 #寫作批改作文 #寫作批改 #線上課程

國中數學會考總複習

講師：Terry Tung

簡介：蒐集分類20年以上的考題，整理90年以後到最新的國中會考試題並依照108課綱版本重新編排整理。考生可依據國...

國中自然會考總複習

講師：Terry Tung

簡介：20年數據精煉：從傳統考題到最新會考趨勢，我們為你濾掉過時資訊，只留最關鍵、最高頻的考點，讓你的練習每...

X、Y、Z、M超Y理論

描述：超別說明

教育優先區

描述：英國普勞頓報告書

消防與災害防救法規概要

描述：消防與災害防救法規概要。 110年考上，因家庭因素沒能前往就職，後續如果修法，內容就沒更新了

221 企業為了增進其對社會大眾與政府的關係，應採用 (A)產品廣告 (B)個人推銷 (C)促銷活動 (D)公共關係

19. 閱讀下列對話，判斷(甲)、(乙)依序最適合填入的詞語為何？ (A) 椿萱並茂／鶯遷喬木 (B) 福壽全歸／鶯遷喬木 (C) 椿萱並茂／蓬蓽生輝 (D) 福壽全歸／蓬蓽生輝

25.關於書信，下列何者敘述正確？ (A) 用於對平輩的提稱語，可用：青鑒、青覽、如晤、如握、如面、收覽、知悉、知之。 (B) 用於對晚輩的結尾祝候語，可用：敬請 教安、祗請 道安、叩請 絳安。 (C) 信封的寫作，在中路直式信封寫受信人姓名，稱對方為「○○○先生」時，「先生」二字要寫小或偏側。如稱對方的職銜，則名 字通常寫在職銜之下，則職銜要寫小或偏右書寫，名字絕不可寫小或偏側。 (D) 信封的啟封詞要視受信人的身分來使用。如對親族長輩用「福啟」、「安啟」；用於一般長輩用「鈞啟」、「賜啟」；平輩用「臺 啟」、「大啟」。

5 模板工程施工中有無收頭困難之處，係下列何項施工的要領中需說明檢討項目？ (A) 設計圖及施工說明書之檢討事項 (B) 施工作業說明書之編制內容 (C) 施工計畫內容 (D) 施工圖送審計畫

複選題II. Passage Completion (20%) Directions: For each blank in the passage, choose a sentence (A~H) that fits the context best. Passage 1 The recent controversy surrounding “Shy Girl,” a novel withdrawn by its publisher after readers detected signs of artificial intelligence involvement, has ignited a fierce debate about the future of literature. When large language models (LLMs) attempt creative writing, the resulting prose often oscillates between flat and lurid. It typically features excessive, clunky metaphors and verbless, staccato sentences. For literary purists, these stylistic glitches are symptomatic of a profound metaphysical void. __ (1) __ Without genuine experiences or emotions, they argue, a bot can never develop an authentic voice or bridge the gap between human minds. However, the assumption that human creation is inherently superior overlooks an uncomfortable truth. __ (2) __ If we compare an LLM’s output to a masterpiece by Vladimir Nabokov, the machine’s text inevitably appears wooden. Yet, when pitted against a generic airport thriller, AI-generated prose can seem remarkably competent. Furthermore, the publishing industry often thrives on derivative content, marketing new books as mere hybrids of previous bestsellers. The case of “Shy Girl” perfectly illustrates this blurred line. Despite the ensuing scandal, online reviews indicate that many readers genuinely enjoyed the book. __ (3) __ In fact, some genre novelists are already openly utilizing bots to bypass the grunt work of writing, inputting established tropes to generate content. As these models rapidly improve, we may soon see a market where readers request highly customized fiction tailored to their exact preferences. Meanwhile, the ethical and legal battles are just beginning. Writers are justifiably aggrieved that their original works were ingested without consent to train their soulless competitors. __ (4) __ To protect human authors, some publishers are banking on certification schemes to guarantee that a book was written by an organic human being. However, as AI tools become ubiquitous in research and editing, this binary categorization may eventually collapse. Ultimately, the question is not merely whether a brilliant human writer can outperform a machine. The truly salient issue is an economic one. __ (5) __ The moral of this literary controversy is not that AI writing should be outright banned; rather, human authors must find a way to commercially and artistically outcompete it. (AB) Even if human genius remains unmatched, it is uncertain whether enough readers will pay a premium to sustain the traditional publishing industry. (AC) Because AI lacks a soul, it is fundamentally incapable of the fraught exercise of freedom that defines true art. (AD) Consequently, class-action lawsuits are currently underway to demand compensation for this omnivorous form of plagiarism. (AE) Although the accused author ultimately confessed to utilizing algorithms, she maintained that the software merely assisted with minor grammatical corrections. (BC) The reality is that a significant portion of human-authored commercial fiction is itself highly formulaic and lacking in originality. (BD) Furthermore, historical evidence suggests that every major technological disruption initially faces fierce, yet ultimately futile, resistance from traditionalists. (BE) This phenomenon suggests that a substantial segment of the reading public remains completely unfazed by undeclared machine involvement. (CD) To combat this trend, literary agencies have collectively agreed to boycott any manuscripts suspected of lacking organic human authorship. 1.

複選題2.(AB) Even if human genius remains unmatched, it is uncertain whether enough readers will pay a premium to sustain the traditional publishing industry. (AC) Because AI lacks a soul, it is fundamentally incapable of the fraught exercise of freedom that defines true art. (AD) Consequently, class-action lawsuits are currently underway to demand compensation for this omnivorous form of plagiarism. (AE) Although the accused author ultimately confessed to utilizing algorithms, she maintained that the software merely assisted with minor grammatical corrections. (BC) The reality is that a significant portion of human-authored commercial fiction is itself highly formulaic and lacking in originality. (BD) Furthermore, historical evidence suggests that every major technological disruption initially faces fierce, yet ultimately futile, resistance from traditionalists. (BE) This phenomenon suggests that a substantial segment of the reading public remains completely unfazed by undeclared machine involvement. (CD) To combat this trend, literary agencies have collectively agreed to boycott any manuscripts suspected of lacking organic human authorship.