關於阿摩
80萬題免費題庫,最詳盡的詳解,是您考試的必備利器!

錯在阿摩,贏在考場!

考試一覽表

公職考試
普考高考初等考試
司法特考地方特考外交特考
民航特考社福特考稅務特考
警察特考鐵路特考關務特考
原住民特考國安局特考海巡署特考
移民署特考薦任升官等調查局特考
警察升官等退除役人員一般警察特考
國軍轉任考試國際經濟商務專利商標審查
身心障礙特考
就業考試
一般類公路局專業類
清潔隊中油招考中華電信
中華黃頁中鋁招考中鋼招考
原住民類台北捷運台灣菸酒
台糖招考台船招考台電招考
台電雇用外貿協會桃園捷運
桃園機場漁會招考漢翔招考
營安管理畜牧獸醫群創光電
農會招考郵局招考銀行招考
國軍&預官一般營運類中央造幣廠
台積電招考水利會招考港務局招考
環保局招考身心障礙組身心障礙類
阿里山鐵路台水(自來水)原住民類職別
一般經營管理類營運儲備人員類身心障礙類職別
數位內容設計創意班
教職考試
教師檢定教師甄試教育學程
公幼教保員學校營養師學校護理師
教師公費碩士
證照考試
CQTEECIC3
TQCCAMSIPAS
JAVAPVQCTBSA
TimsEMT-1adwords
監理所驗光師丙級檢定
乙級檢定保健食品奧林匹亞
專技人員工地主任工程品質
微析科技日文檢定英文檢定
遊程規劃金融證照電子商務
業餘無線電計程車登記兒科專科醫師
內科專科醫師專任運動教練華語教學能力
行政院原子能製造管理證照駕照-職業汽車
病歷資訊管理師醫學資訊管理師
升學考試
EMBA國中國小
高中二技統測四技統測
在職專班學力鑑定私醫聯招
警大二技警專考試學士後中醫
學士後西醫轉學考(插大)轉學考(高職)
研究所(碩士)
國外考試
日本新加坡
錯在阿摩,贏在考場!

搜尋:overemphasize

Passage Two Questions 57 to 61 are based on the following passage. In the college-admissions wars, we parents are the true fights. We are pushing our kids to get good grades, take SAT preparatory courses and build resumes so they can get into the college of our first choice. I’ve twice been to the wars, and as I survey the battlefield, something different is happening. We see our kids’ college background as e prize demonstrating how well we’ve raised them. But we can’t acknowledge that our obsession(痴迷) is more about us than them. So we’ve contrived various justifications that turn out to be half-truths, prejudices or myths. It actually doesn’t matter much whether Aaron and Nicole go to Stanford. We have a full-blown prestige panic; we worry that there won’t be enough prizes to go around. Fearful parents urge their children to apply to more schools than ever. Underlying the hysteria(歇斯底里) is the belief that scarce elite degrees must be highly valuable. Their graduates must enjoy more success because they get a better education and develop better contacts. All that is plausible——and mostly wrong. We haven’t found any convincing evidence that selectivity or prestige matters. Selective schools don’t systematically employ better instructional approaches than less selective schools. On two measures——professors’ feedback and the number of essay exams——selective schools do slightly worse. By some studies, selective schools do enhance their graduates’ lifetime earnings. The gain is reckoned at 2-4% for every 100-poinnt increase in a school’s average SAT scores. But even this advantage is probably a statistical fluke(偶然). A well-known study examined students who got into highly selective schools and then went elsewhere. They earned just as much as graduates from higher-status schools. Kids count more than their colleges.Getting into yale may signify intellgence,talent and Ambition. But it’s not the only indicator and,paradoxically,its significance is declining.The reason:so many similar people go elsewhere.Getting into college is not life only competiton.Old-boy networks are breaking down.princeton economist Alan Krueger studied admissions to one top Ph.D.program.High scores on the GRE helpd explain who got in;degrees of prestigious universities didn’t. So,parents,lighten up.the stakes have been vastly exaggerated.up to a point,we can rationalize our pushiness.America is a competitive society;our kids need to adjust to that.but too much pushiness can be destructive.the very ambition we impose on our children may get some into Harvard but may also set them up for disappointment.one study found that,other things being equal,graduates of highly selective schools experienced more job dissatisfaction.They may have been so conditioned to deing on top that anything less disappoints. 注意 此部分试题请在答题卡2上作答。
【題組】61.One possible result of pushing children into elite universities is that______
(A).they earb less than their peers from other institutions
(B).they turn out to be less competitive in the job market
(C).they experience more job dissatisfaction after graduation
(D).they overemphasize their qualifications in job application

編輯私有筆記及自訂標籤
答案:C
難度:非常困難

10
 【站僕】摩檸Morning:有沒有達人來解釋一下?
倒數 1天 ,已有 0 則答案


Passage Two Questions 57 to 61 are based on the following passage. In the college-admissions wars, we parents are the true fights. We are pushing our kids to get good grades, take SAT preparatory courses and build resumes so they can get into the college of our first choice. I’ve twice been to the wars, and as I survey the battlefield, something different is happening. We see our kids’ college background as e prize demonstrating how well we’ve raised them. But we can’t acknowledge that our obsession(痴迷) is more about us than them. So we’ve contrived various justifications that turn out to be half-truths, prejudices or myths. It actually doesn’t matter much whether Aaron and Nicole go to Stanford. We have a full-blown prestige panic; we worry that there won’t be enough prizes to go around. Fearful parents urge their children to apply to more schools than ever. Underlying the hysteria(歇斯底里) is the belief that scarce elite degrees must be highly valuable. Their graduates must enjoy more success because they get a better education and develop better contacts. All that is plausible——and mostly wrong. We haven’t found any convincing evidence that selectivity or prestige matters. Selective schools don’t systematically employ better instructional approaches than less selective schools. On two measures——professors’ feedback and the number of essay exams——selective schools do slightly worse. By some studies, selective schools do enhance their graduates’ lifetime earnings. The gain is reckoned at 2-4% for every 100-poinnt increase in a school’s average SAT scores. But even this advantage is probably a statistical fluke(偶然). A well-known study examined students who got into highly selective schools and then went elsewhere. They earned just as much as graduates from higher-status schools. Kids count more than their colleges.Getting into yale may signify intellgence,talent and Ambition. But it’s not the only indicator and,paradoxically,its significance is declining.The reason:so many similar people go elsewhere.Getting into college is not life only competiton.Old-boy networks are breaking down.princeton economist Alan Krueger studied admissions to one top Ph.D.program.High scores on the GRE helpd explain who got in;degrees of prestigious universities didn’t. So,parents,lighten up.the stakes have been vastly exaggerated.up to a point,we can rationalize our pushiness.America is a competitive society;our kids need to adjust to that.but too much pushiness can be destructive.the very ambition we impose on our children may get some into Harvard but may also set them up for disappointment.one study found that,other things being equal,graduates of highly selective schools experienced more job dissatisfaction.They may have been so conditioned to deing on top that anything less disappoints.
【題組】61.One possible result of pushing children into elite universities is that______ A.they earb less than their peers from other institutions B.they turn out to be less competitive in the job market C.they experience more job dissatisfaction after graduation D.they overemphasize their qualifications in job application

編輯私有筆記及自訂標籤
答案:C
難度:非常困難