【系統公告】頁面上方功能列及下方資訊全面更換新版，舊用戶可再切回舊版。 前往查看

高普考/三四等/高員級◆英文題庫下載題庫

上一題
American public and private agencies spend millions of dollars annually attempting to persuade citizens to drink alcohol only in “moderate” amounts or not at all, particularly when operating a motor vehicle. Studies indicate that this propaganda and advertising approach is almost totally ineffective. Alcohol consumption continues to rise nationally, and alcohol-related traffic deaths, especially for teenage drivers, have increased. In contrast to the American approach, Norway has severe, but meaningful, penalties for driving while drunk. These include periods of compulsory public work (picking up trash along highways), mandatory jail sentences that do not interfere with one’s work (a member of the Norwegian royal family will be equally punished if guilty). As a result, many Norwegians use taxis or the drivers not drinking when spending a night on the town.
【題組】47 The example of the Norwegian royal family is used to illustrate ____.
(A) that no one is exempt from the penalty for drunk driving
(B) that some people are exempt from drunk driving penalties
(C) that a member of the Norwegian royal family is currently charged with drunk driving
(D) that the members of the Norwegian royal family have a problem with drunk driving

答案：登入後觀看
難度： 適中
1F
Dorothy 高二上 (2019/02/13)

美國公共和私人機構每年花費數百萬美元試圖說服公民僅以“適量”飲酒或根本不飲酒，特別是在操作機動車時。研究表明，這種宣傳和廣告方式幾乎完全無效。全國的酒精消費量持續上升，與酒精相關的交通死亡人數增加，尤其是青少年司機。與美國的做法相反，挪威在醉酒駕駛時會受到嚴厲但有意義的懲罰。這些包括強制性公共工作時期（在高速公路上撿垃圾），強制性監禁判決不會干擾一個人的工作（如果有罪，挪威王室成員將受到同等懲罰）。因此，許多挪威人在城裡過夜時會使用出租車或司機不喝酒。

(A) that no one is exempt from the penalty for drunk driving 
豁免


American public and private agencies spe..-阿摩線上測驗