高普考/三四等/高員級◆英文題庫下載題庫

上一題
35 The US Supreme Court rules that, barring circumstances like child abduction or a ticking time bomb, the Fourth Amendment of the US Constitution requires police to get a warrant before examining a cell phone after an arrest. This ruling makes our digital privacy no "less worthy of the protection for which the Founders of our nation fought."
(A) Under certain extreme conditions, the Fourth Amendment can be temporarily suspended.
(B) The Fourth Amendment is considered a ticking time bomb by the US Constitution.
(C) The police needs to get the authorities' approval to search any suspect's cell phone.
(D) The founders of the USA also fought for their digital privacy.


答案:登入後觀看
難度: 困難
最佳解!
waterbear (2016/08/10)
翻譯有點爛,湊合著參考吧:美國最高法院裁定:除非像誘拐兒童或定時炸彈的情況,憲法第四修正案要求警察逮捕(犯人)後,要檢查手機之前需得到搜查令(才能進行檢查)。這一規定並未使我們的數位隱私比較不.....觀看完整全文,請先登入
3F
“勞謙君子,有終吉” 研一下 (2018/05/20)

美國最高法院裁定,除了綁架兒童或定...



(內容隱藏中)
查看隱藏文字
4F
厭世彩色筆 高三下 (2020/06/15)

(A)在某些極端情況下,可以暫時中止第四修正案。

5F
MARY 高三下 (2022/03/31)

The US Supreme Court rules that, (美國最高法院裁定)
barring circumstances like(除了處理像是) child abduction(孩童綁架案) or a ticking time bomb(定時炸彈案),---這種較為急的案件以外
the Fourth Amendment of the US Constitution (第四修憲案) requires police to (要求警察必須)
get a warrant before examining a cell phone after an arrest. (必須先取得授權才能在逮捕嫌犯後檢查手機)
This ruling makes our digital privacy  no "less worthy of the protection
(這個規定是為了要保護人民的隱私權)
 for which the Founders of our nation fought.(當初開拓美國的先人們所主張的隱私權)" 

如有錯誤, 請多多指教

簡單來說, 除非是很...


查看完整內容

35 The US Supreme Court rules that, barr..-阿摩線上測驗