35 The US Supreme Court rules that, barring circumstances like child abduction or a ticking time bomb, the Fourth
Amendment of the US Constitution requires police to get a warrant before examining a cell phone after an arrest.
This ruling makes our digital privacy no "less worthy of the protection for which the Founders of our nation
fought."
(A) Under certain extreme conditions, the Fourth Amendment can be temporarily suspended.
(B) The Fourth Amendment is considered a ticking time bomb by the US Constitution.
(C) The police needs to get the authorities' approval to search any suspect's cell phone.
(D) The founders of the USA also fought for their digital privacy.
The US Supreme Court rules that, (美國最高法院裁定) barring circumstances like(除了處理像是) child abduction(孩童綁架案) or a ticking time bomb(定時炸彈案),---這種較為急的案件以外 the Fourth Amendment of the US Constitution (第四修憲案) requires police to (要求警察必須) get a warrant before examining a cell phone after an arrest. (必須先取得授權才能在逮捕嫌犯後檢查手機) This ruling makes our digital privacy no "less worthy of the protection (這個規定是為了要保護人民的隱私權) for which the Founders of our nation fought.(當初開拓美國的先人們所主張的隱私權)"
The US Supreme Court rules that, (美國最高法院裁定) barring circumstances like(除了處理像是) child abduction(孩童綁架案) or a ticking time bomb(定時炸彈案),---這種較為急的案件以外 the Fourth Amendment of the US Constitution (第四修憲案) requires police to (要求警察必須) get a warrant before examining a cell phone after an arrest. (必須先取得授權才能在逮捕嫌犯後檢查手機) This ruling makes our digital privacy no "less worthy of the protection (這個規定是為了要保護人民的隱私權) for which the Founders of our nation fought.(當初開拓美國的先人們所主張的隱私權)"
寫作批改
VIP與詳解卡管理
私人筆記( 1 )
