國營事業◆英文題庫下載題庫

上一題
四、閱讀測驗 

The Utah “free-range parenting” law, which went into effect this month, states that it doesn’t constitute neglect if parents allow their children to do activities such as walking to school, riding their bikes or playing on a playground without adult supervision, provided that the children are “of sufficient age and maturity to avoid harm or unreasonable risk of harm.” It also says leaving a child 6 years old or older alone in a car temporarily does not constitute neglect. 

Arkansas State Senator Alan Clark authored a similar bill last year but hit a wall in the lower house because of concerns it could endanger children. He is optimistic that Utah’s law will show that that isn’t the case. “It’s always the fear factor…but people are beginning to see we have too much fear,” he said. Support cuts across party lines. New York Assemblyman Phil Steck is pushing similar legislation. “When I was a child, you let your dogs and your children out after breakfast and…they had to be home for dinner. I felt I gained a lot more from just playing on the street than my children did from being in organized sports activities,” he said. Such practices had been the norm for decades, but parental neglect laws were strengthened starting the 1980s amid growing concerns of child abduction and abuse, symbolized by the use of milk cartons to profile missing children. 

The issue recently has led to episodes of parents being charged with criminal neglect for allowing their children to play outdoors on their own. In one highly publicized case, a Maryland couple, Danielle and Leonard Meitiv, were investigated by state child protective services in 2014 for letting their children, ages 10 and 6, walk home from their local park. Utah Senator Lincoln Fillmore said such overzealousness does not benefit anyone. “As a society, we’ve kind of erred as our pendulum has swung for children’s safety a little bit too much to the side of helicopter parenting, right? We want kids to be able to learn how to navigate the world so when they’re adults they’re fully prepared to handle things on their own,” he told a reporter after the law was passed.

【題組】24. What is true about Danielle and Leonard Meitiv?
(A) They endorsed helicopter parenting laws.
(B)They violated Maryland laws a few years ago.
(C) Their children’s photos were printed on milk cartons.
(D) Their high-profile case endangered their children’s safety.


答案:登入後觀看
難度: 困難
最佳解!
Luke Yan 國一下 (2019/02/19)
In one highly publicized case, a Maryland couple, Danielle and Leonard Meitiv, were investigated by state child protective services in 2014 for letting their children, ages 10 and 6, walk .....看完整詳解
3F
Mi de Chen 高三下 (2019/10/20)
24. Danielle和Leonard Meitiv的情況如何?(A)他們贊同直升機育兒法。(B)他們幾年前違反了馬里蘭州的法律。(C)他們孩子的照片印在牛奶紙箱上。(D)他們備受矚目的案件危及孩子的安全。
4F
112年已上岸,挑戰極限 博二下 (2021/10/04)

helicopter parenting

直升機式育兒法。是指過份介入兒女生活,保護或是干預其生活的育兒方式,因為類似直升機一樣的盤旋在兒女身邊,此類父母故稱為直升機家長。

 In one highly publicized case, a Maryland couple, Danielle and Leonard Meitiv, were investigated by state child protective services in 2014 for letting their children, ages 10 and 6, walk home from their local park.

在一個廣為人知的案例中,馬里蘭州的一對夫婦 Danielle 和 Leonard Meitiv 於 2014 年因為讓 10 歲和 6 歲的孩子從當地公園步行回家而受到州兒童保護服務機構的調查。

Danielle 和 Leonard Meitiv 的真實情況是什麼?

(A) 他們支持直升機育兒法。

(B) 幾...


查看完整內容

四、閱讀測驗 The Utah “free-range parenting” l..-阿摩線上測驗