【詳解卡新福利】寫作批改懸賞券,將於 2024/10/31 23:59:59 過期,還沒使用或領取,趕快前往領取並使用吧! 前往查看

銀行◆英文題庫下載題庫

上一題
第二篇: In the 1950s, women were expected to stay at home, and those who wanted to work were often stigmatized. Today it’s mostly the other way round, setting women against one another along the fault lines of conviction, economic class and need, and, often, ethnicity. 

Across the developed world, women who stay home are increasingly seen as old-fashioned and an economic burden to society. If their husbands are rich, they are frequently criticized for being lazy; if they are immigrants, for keeping children from learning the language and ways of their host country. Their daily chores of cleaning, cooking or raising their children have always been ignored by national accounts (If a man marries his housekeeper and stops paying her for her work, G.D.P. goes down. If a woman stops nursing and buys formula for her baby, G.D.P. goes up.). In a debate that counts women catching up with men in education and the labor market in terms of raising productivity and economic growth, stay-at-home moms are valued less than ever. This is so despite the fact that from Norway to the United States, economists put the value of their unpaid work ahead of that of the manufacturing sector.

 In countries where mothers still struggle to combine career with family and quit work less out of conviction than out of necessity, they are often doubly punished. In Germany, the biggest economy in Europe, most schools still finish at lunchtime, and full-time nurseries for children under 3 are scarce. Yet in this generation of young mothers you are more likely to find women saying they are on extended maternity leave or between jobs than admitting they are housewives. Only among the wealthy is it seen as class status when the highly educated mother takes children to Chinese or violin lessons.

 “It’s hard to find a balance between not romanticizing and not stigmatizing housewives,” said a professor of economics at the University of Massachusetts. “Even though a number of women still stay at home, a cultural shift has put them on the defensive.”

【題組】57. Why is G.D.P. mentioned in the second paragraph?
(A) To show that housewives’ efforts are often not properly valued
(B) To illustrate how much money is lost by women quitting their jobs
(C) To encourage men to marry their housekeepers
(D) To prove that immigrants fail to raise their children well in developed countries


答案:登入後觀看
難度: 簡單

10
 【站僕】摩檸Morning:有沒有達人來解釋一下?
倒數 1天 ,已有 1 則答案
Pow 大一下 (2019/11/23):

57.【題組】57. Why is G.D.P. mentioned in the second paragraph?
(A) To show that housewives’ efforts are often not properly valued
(B) To illustrate how much money is lost by women quitting their jobs
(C) To encourage men to marry their housekeepers
(D) To prove that immigrants fail to raise their children well in developed countries
答案:A
57.【題組】57。為什麼在第二段中提到G.D.P.?
(A)證明家庭主婦的努力往往沒有得到適當的重視
(B)說明女性辭職損失了多少錢
(C)鼓勵男人與管家結婚
(D)證明移民在發達國家未能很好地撫養子女
答案:A

===========================

valued  adj.受敬重的; 寶貴的 、貴重的;寶貴的;重要的;已經過估價的

properly 恰當地;正確地;有禮貌地;體面地

==============================

Their daily chores of cleaning, cooking or raising their children have always been ignored by national accounts (If a man marries his housekeeper and stops paying her for her work, G.D.P. goes down.
If a woman stops nursing and buys formula for her baby, G.D.P. goes up.).

在國民經濟核算中,清潔、做飯或撫養孩子等日常瑣事總是被忽略(如果一個男人和他的管家結婚,不再為她的工作付錢,G.D.P就會下降)。
如果一個女人停止哺乳,給她的孩子買配方奶粉,G.D.P 就會上升





1個讚
檢舉


第二篇: In the 1950s, women were expected t..-阿摩線上測驗