【預告】5/13(一)起，第三階段頁面上方功能列以及下方資訊全面更換新版。 前往查看

郵局◆英文題庫下載題庫

上一題
If you love nature and the wilderness, you may have a hard time seeing organic farms and solar energy as environmental dangers. But that is the position of some hard greens. Hard greens argue that mainstream environmentalists often promote policies that hurt the planet. Hard greens say that if you want to save the wilderness and protect endangered species, you have to move people off the land and concentrate them in cities. They argue that the pollution produced by large cities and their close suburbs does less danger to the planet and its wild life than the forests that are cut down for farmland, country homes and suburban development. When an organic farmer clears land of trees and bushes to plant fields of organic vegetables, the natural habitat of wild vegetation and animals is destroyed-even if the farmer isn’t using pesticides. Put another way, hard greens would say that you have to reduce man’s footprint on the earth. Here are some positions of “hard greens:” Except in unforested areas that receive a great deal of sun, widespread use of solar energy will seriously damage the environment. In order to produce enough solar energy to provide power to New York City, for example, almost all the forests in the state of New York would have to be cut down to make room for solar cells. Food should be produced by large agribusiness corporations rather than small family farmers. Large corporate farms are more efficient than small farms and produce more food on less land. Organic farming and pesticide-free farm products should be discouraged because they are inefficient. When pesticides are not used, more land must be cleared to produce the same amount of food.
【題組】50. What do hard greens think about large agribusiness companies4 
(A) They often control the market and result in rise of food prices. 
(B) They are able to produce more food on less land, and are thus more efficient. 
(C) Large agribusinesses tend to overuse pesticide, and thus should be inspected regularly. 
(D) Too many large agribusiness companies may lead to clearing of more forests for farmland.

答案：登入後觀看
難度： 簡單
最佳解!
業精於勤，事立於豫 研一下 (2017/04/21)
What do hard greens ☆☆☆☆☆ ...


(內容隱藏中)
查看隱藏文字
3F
Yu-Ching 大三上 (2017/05/25)

倒數第二段的文句末

Food should be produced by large agribusiness corporations rather than small family farmers.

而後一句

Large corporate farms are more efficient than small farms and produce more food on less land.

可得知 (B) 選項為答案

4F
hchungw 研一上 (2020/12/04)

Large corporate farms are more efficient than small farms and produce more food on less land. 

大型公司農場比小型農場效率更高，並且在更少的土地上生產更多的糧食。


50. What do hard greens think about large agribusiness companies?

(hard greens對大型農業綜合企業的看法)


(B) They are able to produce more food on less land, and are thus more efficient.

(B)他們能夠在更少的土地上生產更多的食物，因此效率更高。


If you love nature and the wilderness, y..-阿摩線上測驗