34 According to the passage, what happened in Brazil?
(A)The people of Brazil lived peacefully in 1964.
(B)Military forces influenced the themes of samba in the 1980s.
(C)Brazilian music encompasses elements of several music genres.
(D)Some Brazilians were in exile due to the fact that they showed restrictive thinking.
統計: A(1), B(6), C(43), D(16), E(0) #2345382
詳解 (共 3 筆)
我們來檢視關於巴西發生的事件的各個陳述,判斷何者是正確的。
(A) The people of Brazil lived peacefully in 1964. 根據 Passage 2,文章提到:「The 1960s were tumultuous political times in Brazil. Worsening economic problems and weak political leadership led to the armed forces seizing power in 1964。」這表示 1964 年的巴西政治動盪,並且武裝部隊奪取了政權,這與「和平生活」的說法相悖。因此,這個陳述是錯誤的。
(B) Military forces influenced the themes of samba in the 1980s. Passage 2 描述了軍政府(military government)在 1960 年代和 1970 年代初期的鎮壓和緊張關係,以及藝術家因此入獄或流亡。文章提到了 Samba 在 1970 年代開始被年輕聽眾接受,融入現代和電氣樂器。文章中沒有提及軍事力量影響 Samba 的主題,也沒有提到在 1980 年代發生的情況。因此,這個陳述沒有在文章中得到支持。
(C) Brazilian music encompasses elements of several music genres. Passage 2 在描述 1970 年代巴西音樂場景時提到:「An enormous amount of music was created and combined with jazz, classical, rock, and other forms。」以及稱此為「This musical melting pot of artists and genres」。這明確表示巴西音樂融合了多種音樂流派的元素。因此,這個陳述是正確的。
(D) Some Brazilians were in exile due to the fact that they showed restrictive thinking. Passage 2 提到:「artists who spoke out against the government repression found themselves in prison or in exile。」這表示藝術家是因為「反對」政府的鎮壓而流亡,而不是因為他們表現出「限制性思維 (restrictive thinking)」,「限制性思維」通常指思想保守或受到限制,這與「反對」鎮壓的行為相反。因此,這個陳述是錯誤的。
根據 Passage 2 的內容,只有陳述 (C) 與文章描述相符。
因此,根據來源 Passage 2,關於巴西發生的事情,正確的陳述是:(C) Brazilian music encompasses elements of several music genres.