35 The lawyer’s ______ argument, with its logical reasoning and supporting evidence, convinced the jury of his client’s innocence.
(A) feeble
(B) ineffective
(C) persuasive
(D) unconvincing
答案:登入後查看
統計: A(57), B(95), C(916), D(52), E(0) #3184948
統計: A(57), B(95), C(916), D(52), E(0) #3184948
詳解 (共 9 筆)
#6244061
The lawyer’s persuasive argument, with its logical reasoning and supporting evidence, convinced the jury of his client’s innocence.
(A) feeble
(B) ineffective
(C) persuasive
(D) unconvincing
(A) feeble
(B) ineffective
(C) persuasive
(D) unconvincing
ㅤㅤ
律師有說服力的論點,連同邏輯推理和支持證據,讓陪審團相信他的客戶是無辜的。
(A) 微弱
(B) 無效
(C) 有說服力
(D) 沒有說服力
(A) 微弱
(B) 無效
(C) 有說服力
(D) 沒有說服力
9
0
#7294034
35 The lawyer’s ______ argument, with its logical reasoning and supporting evidence, convinced確信 the jury of his client’s innocence.
ㅤㅤ
35. 律師的______論證,憑藉其邏輯推理和佐證,最終說服了陪審團相信其委託人無罪。
ㅤㅤ
ㅤㅤ
(A) 薄弱的
(B) 無效的
(C) 有說服力的
(D) 不令人信服的
(A) feeble
(B) ineffective
(C) persuasive
(D) unconvincing
0
0