35. Dough was finally let go as a result of calling in sick two, three times a week. So he was ___.
(A) approved to leave
(B) left his job
(C) not stopped
(D) fired from work

Dough was finally let go as a result of calling in sick two, three times a week. So he was ___. 
(A) approved to leave 
(B) left his job 
(C) not stopped 
(D) fired from work
 Dough終於被放生了因為他一個禮拜請兩三天病假。所以他被炒魷魚了。

(A)被允許離職 (與前句意思不符)

(B)被離開他的工作 (不適用被動式)

(C)沒有被阻止 (語意不詳)

(D)被炒魷魚

let go 放; 放出

as a result of = because of 因為...; 由於...

call in sick 請病假

two, three times a week 一周兩三次

huei您好,

(A)選項文法上並沒有問題，但題目的第二句(So, he was _____ )應該是第一句的延伸，所以我才會說是與前句意思不符。

兩個句子有點換句話說，如下，

Dough was let go...=he was fired...

希望有解決您的問題！ 

感謝，看出強調" was let go" 的語意了

不知道是不是自己的判斷力問題，總覺得自己一個禮拜請假多次，自請離職也是正常，為什麼是公司炒魷魚，且我在句中看不出來老闆有不開心的含義．還是說(A)選項有文法上的問題呢？希望有前輩指點！