阿摩線上測驗
43 Which of the following statements best describes the main idea of this passage?
(A)It is hazardous to be physicians these days because half of them are sued.
(B)If a doctor does not want to be sued, he should try to spend three minutes on each patient.
(C)Whether physicians are sued or not depends on how they talk to their patients.
(D)All physicians give equal amounts of information to their patients.
答案：登入後查看
統計： A(33), B(65), C(199), D(39), E(0) #370984
統計： A(33), B(65), C(199), D(39), E(0) #370984
詳解 (共 6 筆)
索尼
#638277
沒題目
1
0
相信自己一定可以(地特四等民政上榜)
#1463073
TO 1F:雖然你可能已經上榜了
沒有相反喔!
(C)他們是否被起訴取決於他們跟病人對談的方式
0
0
索尼
#638279
沒題目
0
0
用功的小孩
#482929
(C)因果是不是相反啊?
0
0
儒
#662177
題目應為
Recently the medical researcher Wendy Levinson recorded hundreds of
conversations between a group of physicians and their patients. Roughly
half of the doctors had never been sued. The other half had been sued at
least twice. Levinson found that just on the basis of those conversations,
she could find clear differences between the two groups. The surgeons
who had never been sued spent more than three minutes longer with
each patient than those who had been sued did (18.3 minutes versus 15
minutes). They were more likely to make orienting comments, such as
“First I'll examine you, and then we will take the problem over” or “I will
leave time for your questions”—which help patients get a sense of what
the visit is supposed to accomplish and when they can ask questions.
They were more likely to engage in active listening, saying such things
as “Go on, tell me more about that,” and they were far more likely to
laugh and be funny during the visit. Interestingly, there was no big
difference in the amount or quality of information they gave their
patients; they didn't provide more details about medication or the
patient's condition. The difference was entirely in how they talked to
their patients.
Recently the medical researcher Wendy Levinson recorded hundreds of
conversations between a group of physicians and their patients. Roughly
half of the doctors had never been sued. The other half had been sued at
least twice. Levinson found that just on the basis of those conversations,
she could find clear differences between the two groups. The surgeons
who had never been sued spent more than three minutes longer with
each patient than those who had been sued did (18.3 minutes versus 15
minutes). They were more likely to make orienting comments, such as
“First I'll examine you, and then we will take the problem over” or “I will
leave time for your questions”—which help patients get a sense of what
the visit is supposed to accomplish and when they can ask questions.
They were more likely to engage in active listening, saying such things
as “Go on, tell me more about that,” and they were far more likely to
laugh and be funny during the visit. Interestingly, there was no big
difference in the amount or quality of information they gave their
patients; they didn't provide more details about medication or the
patient's condition. The difference was entirely in how they talked to
their patients.
0
0
Shi Jou
#521640
43，下面的語句描述了這段話的主要思想嗎？
（A）這是有害的，是醫生這些天，因為一半的人被起訴。
（B）如果醫生不希望被起訴，他對每個病人應盡量花三分鐘。
（C）醫師是否被起訴或不依賴於他們如何談論他們的病人。
（D）所有的醫生給病人等量的信息。
（A）這是有害的，是醫生這些天，因為一半的人被起訴。
（B）如果醫生不希望被起訴，他對每個病人應盡量花三分鐘。
（C）醫師是否被起訴或不依賴於他們如何談論他們的病人。
（D）所有的醫生給病人等量的信息。
0
0