49. What can readers infer from the passage?
(A) The fashion industry did not cause harm to nature until the rise of dupe culture.
(B) Big brands can sue influencers for copying their ideas.
(C) People have always been able to afford luxury goods.
(D) When shopping, consumers consider influencers’ reviews.

答案：登入後查看
統計： A(6), B(7), C(4), D(24), E(0) #3492382

詳解 (共 2 筆)

#6567031
【題組】49. What can re...
(共 396 字，隱藏中）
前往觀看
4
0
#7344450

題目翻譯：
49. 讀者可以從這篇文章推論出什麼？

選項翻譯：
(A) The fashion industry did not cause harm to nature until the rise of dupe culture.：在仿品文化興起之前，時尚產業並未對環境造成傷害

(B) Big brands can sue influencers for copying their ideas.：大品牌可以因為網紅抄襲其想法而提告

(C) People have always been able to afford luxury goods.：人們一直都買得起奢侈品

(D) When shopping, consumers consider influencers’ reviews.：購物時，消費者會考慮網紅的評論

解析：
文章提到網紅分享評測、影響消費者選擇，因此可推論消費者購物時會參考這些評論。

答案為 (D) When shopping, consumers consider influencers’ reviews.

0
0