研究所、轉學考(插大)、學士後-英文題庫下載題庫

上一題
    I consider myself a scientist, and the theory of evolution is central to my thinking. I am a social scientist and have been informed by insights from many social sciences, including economics. Yet I have very little sympathy with hegemonic attempts to explain all human behaviors via evolutionary psychology, via rational-choice economics and/or by a combination of these two frameworks.
     In a planet occupied by over 7 billion inhabitants, I am amazed by the difference one human being can make. Think of classical music with Mozart or Stravinsky; of painting without Caravaggio, Picasso or Pollock; of drama with Shakespeare or Beckett. Think of the incredible contributions of Michelangelo or Leonardo, or, in recent times, the outpouring of deep feeling at the death of Steve Jobs (or, for that matter, Michael Jackson or Princess Diana). Think of human values in the absence of Moses or Christ.
      Alas, not all singular individuals make a positive difference. The history of the 20th century would be far happier had it not been for Hitler, Stalin, or Mao (or the 21st century without Bin Laden). But in reaction to these individuals, there sometimes arise more praiseworthy figures: Konrad Adenauer in Germany, Mikhail Gorbachev in the Soviet Union, Deng Xiaoping in China. These successors also make a signal difference.

     I consider Mahatma Gandhi to be the most important human being o

ennium. His achievements in India speak for themselves. But even if Gan

ributed vital energy and leadership in his own country, he had enormous influence

peaceful resisters across the globe: Nelson Mandela in South Africa, Martin Luther King Jr.

United States, and the solitary figures in Tiananmen Square in 1989

Square in 2011.

      Despite the laudatory efforts of scientists to ferret out patterns in human

tinue to be struck by the impact of single individuals, or of small group

nst the odds. As scholars, we cannot and should not sweep these instances under

investigative rug. We should bear in mind anthropologist Margaret Mead's famous

injunction: "Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful committed citizens can change

the world, indeed, it is the only that ever has."

                                                                       ~~Howard Gardner


【題組】49. Which statement reflects the author's views?
(A) Gandhi failed to bring about change to India, his own country.
(B) Solidarity is power. We must stand together to bring about change.
(C) There is strength in numbers.
(D) Solitary figures can change the world.


答案:登入後觀看 [無官方正解]
難度: 計算中

10
 【站僕】摩檸Morning:有沒有達人來解釋一下?
倒數 3天 ,已有 1 則答案
隨手按讚五星 祝上榜 (2024/08/28):

正確答案是 (D) Solitary figures can change the world.

解釋:

作者在文章中多次提到個人對世界的巨大影響,並引用了瑪格麗特·米德的名言:“永遠不要懷疑一小群有思想、有承諾的公民可以改變世界。”這表明作者認為孤立的個人或小群體也可以改變世界。

其他選項的分析:

  • (A) Gandhi failed to bring about change to India, his own country. 是錯誤的,作者認為甘地對印度產生了重要的影響。
  • (B) Solidarity is power. We must stand together to bring about change. 雖然團結確實重要,但這不是作者在文章中強調的核心觀點。
  • (C) There is strength in numbers. 作者並未特別強調人數的力量,而是更多地強調個人和小群體的影響力。
0個讚
檢舉


    I consider myself a scientist, and t..-阿摩線上測驗