【系統公告】頁面上方功能列及下方資訊全面更換新版,舊用戶可再切回舊版。 前往查看

高普考/三四等/高員級◆英文題庫下載題庫

上一題
請依下文回答第 14 題至第 17 題
        Wikipedia has become the world’s largest reference work. It is setting a blistering pace with more than 1000 new English-language articles being added each day. Its success has attracted harsh criticism from predictable quarters. In an article published recently on Tech Central Station website, Robert McHenry, former editor-in-chief of Encyclopaedia Britannica, disdainfully said that using Wikipedia was like visiting a public restroom. McHenry’s vain attempt to turn up the heat is ironic because it is the old-fangled encyclopedia publishers who are on the hot seat. Wikipedia will put many of them in deep trouble within the next few years.
         Internet users have been voting with their clicks. Traffic to Wikipedia’s 72 servers on any given day exceeds 80 million hits. Wikipedia articles are cited increasingly by mainstream newspapers and magazines. Encyclopedia publishers lambaste Wikipedia’s reliability, but their outrage has blinded them to a sea change in their core market. The way people research and learn in the Internet age is vastly different than it was only a decade ago, and if they fail to adapt, they will suffer.
         How did Wikipedia get started? Jimmy Wales, Wikipedia’s co-founder and leader, began with a simple yet counterintuitive idea: create an open encyclopedia that anyone can contribute to. (The name Wikipedia comes from the “wiki” sort of collaborative software that powers the website.) The project adopted a few canny rules of order: whenever someone edits an article, a new version of the article is created and saved. This is important because Wikipedia is an open-content project. Such projects are fuelled by the prestige and social standing derived by the contributors from the work that they do. Your contribution to an article, no matter how small, is kept for posterity and clearly identified as such.         The continual creation of new versions also discourages antisocial behavior—vandalized articles can be easily reverted. Each article has a separate page where authors can discuss their changes and air their differences. To reduce bias, Wikipedia’s policy is to present a neutral point of view that fairly represents all sides. 

【題組】16 Why are vandalized articles rare on Wikipedia?
(A) Any changes to the articles can be easily undone.
(B) Jimmy Wales forbids the opening of Wikipedia to the public.
(C) Wikipedia is open for editing only to people with high social standing.
(D) People with antisocial behavior are generally uninterested in Wikipedia.


答案:登入後觀看
難度: 簡單
1F
Cassidy Tung 高二上 (2015/02/01)
 The continual creation of new versions also discourages antisocial behavior—vandalized articles can be easily reverted. Each article has a separate page where authors can discuss their changes and air their differences.
新版本持續不斷的創造,也阻止了反社會行為 — — 破壞的文章可以輕鬆地還原。每篇文章有一個單獨的頁面,在這裡作者可以討論他們的變化和不同的樣子。
air可以當樣貌;樣子用

所以答案選A

請依下文回答第 14 題至第 17 題        Wikipedia has..-阿摩線上測驗