62 Securities law intervenes in corporate governance in several ways. From the example of Taiwan’s securities law, which of the following does not reflect this intervention?
(A) Companies cannot solicit and receive proxy from shareholders freely.
(B) Companies need to make a public financial disclosure every season or year.
(C) A certain number of independent directors are required for newly listed companies.
(D) When issuing new stock, participating underwriters need to have licenses, meet strict qualifications, and cannot be bypassed.

答案:登入後查看
統計: A(160), B(177), C(129), D(222), E(0) #2980609

詳解 (共 7 筆)

#5901625
D(跟公司治理無關) securit...
(共 414 字,隱藏中)
前往觀看
17
0
#5866566
From the example of ...
(共 1848 字,隱藏中)
前往觀看
15
10
#6008566
Securities law inte...
(共 786 字,隱藏中)
前往觀看
14
1
#5717834

證劵交易法以多種方式干预公司治理。從政劵交易法的例子来看,以下哪项不反應这種干预?

(A) 公司不能自由地徵求和接受股東的代理權。
(B) 公司每个季度或每年都需要公開財務揭露。
(C) 新上市公司需要拥有一定數量的獨立董事。
(D) 發行新股票时,参與的證券商需要持有牌照,满足嚴格的资格要求,不能被忽视。

9
0
#6531365
D是對承銷商的限制~不是對公司治理,所以選D
3
0
#6547721
(D) When issuing new...
(共 178 字,隱藏中)
前往觀看
1
0
#6424326
corporate governance...
(共 58 字,隱藏中)
前往觀看
0
1

私人筆記 (共 1 筆)

私人筆記#7344477
未解鎖
證券法以多種方式介入公司治理。以臺灣的證...
(共 164 字,隱藏中)
前往觀看
2
0