65 Which of the following statements is UNTRUE for the settlement during the court proceedings?
(A) Where settlement is reached, a settlement transcript shall be made
(B) The parties shall finish the settlement before the end of oral argument of the second instance
(C) Where both parties are close to reach a settlement, they may move the court, the commissioned judge or the assigned judge for a settlement proposal within the scope specified by the parties
(D) Where there is a prospect for the parties to reach settlement, but a party has difficulty to appear in person, the court, the commissioned judge, or the assigned judge may, on motion or on its own initiative, make a settlement proposal

答案：登入後查看
統計： A(6), B(81), C(36), D(33), E(0) #686840

祝各位考生上岸

B2 · 2021/09/08

#5076155

對於訴訟上和解，以下哪個敘述是不正確的？

(A)當事人達成和解，應製作和解筆錄(民訴379)

(B)當事人應當在二審言詞辯論終結前完成和解(377)不問訴訟程度，得隨時試行和解

(C)雙方當事人和解之意思已甚接近者，可以在當事人表明之範圍內聲請法院、受託法官或者受命法官提出和解方案。(民訴377-1)

(D)當事人有達成和解的可能，但當事人本人出庭有困難時，法院、受託法官或者受命法官可以主動提出和解方案(377-2)

第 379 條

試行和解而成立者，應作成和解筆錄。

第 377 條

法院不問訴訟程度如何，得隨時試行和解。受命法官或受託法官亦得為之。

第 377-1 條

當事人和解之意思已甚接近者，兩造得聲請法院、受命法官或受託法官於當事人表明之範圍內，定和解方案。

民事訴訟法第 377-2 條

當事人有和解之望，而一造到場有困難時，法院、受命法官或受託法官得依當事人一造之聲請或依職權提出和解方案。

林扁布(修竹)

B1 · 2016/08/04

#1436513

Code of Civil Procedure art. 377