阿摩線上測驗
登入
首頁
>
公職 - 藥理學與藥物化學
>
102年 - 102 高等考試_三級_藥事:藥理學與藥物化學#44124
>
題組內容
一、試述下列藥物之作用機制和目前臨床用途:(每小題 2 分,共 8 分)
⑴Terbinafine
其他申論題
五、一民用飛機在高空巡航時,如遇右發動機熄火失效或左邊吹來的一陣強側風,此時 飛行員應如何分別操控因應之?其操作原理為何?試詳細闡述之。(20 分)
#144383
一、Please translate the following paragraph into English.(10 分) 申請發明專利時,由專利申請權人備具申請書、說明書、申請專利範圍、摘要及必 要之圖式,向專利專責機關申請。以申請書、說明書、申請專利範圍及必要之圖式 齊備之日為發明專利申請日。
#144384
二、Write a composition entitled: “The latest amendment of Taiwan’s Patent Act dated at June 11, 2013” in English, please write at least 80 words.(20 分)
#144385
三、Please use 40 to 80 words to summarize the following article in English, do not copy any sentence in the excerpt.(20 分) Last February during his Fireside Hangout, President Obama explained that patent trolls (known more formally as Patent Assertion Entities, or PAEs) “don’t actually produce anything themselves. They’re just trying to essentially leverage and hijack somebody else’s idea and see if they can extort some money out of them.” This type of abusive patent litigation is a major problem. It’s also important to know what we’re not talking about here. We aren’t trying to make it harder to pursue legitimate intellectual property rights, or vigorously defend valid patents. Indeed, the United States has the best intellectual property protections in the world, and our system rightly ensures that these innovators are compensated for their creativity. The problem is when rogue companies make a business model out of exploiting and abusing the system, using it not to protect invention but to bring frivolous lawsuits to extract settlements from companies trying to serve American consumers. Bad patents in the system (such as those issued with broad or vague language) only compound the problem, and the issue extends far beyond any one industry.
#144386
⑵Sildenafil
#144388
⑶Rosiglitazone
#144389
⑷Denosumab
#144390
二、試述合併使用 sulfonamides 和 trimethoprim 之作用機制和優點。(4 分)
#144391
⑴Hydrochlorothiazide
#144392
⑵Captopril
#144393