最新資料 | 阿摩線上測驗

最新科目

金融法規(含票據法、保險法及公司法) 及民事訴訟法與強制執行法

民法及行政法

郵局會計學及經濟學

最新試卷

115年 - 115-1 專技高考_社會工作師：社會工作研究方法#137528(42題)

115年 - 115-1 專技高考_社會工作師：社會政策與社會立法#137527(42題)

115年 - 115-1 專技高考_社會工作師：社會工作直接服務#137526(42題)

115年 - 115-1 專技高考_社會工作師：社會工作#137525(42題)

115年 - 115 大學入學美術術科考試試題：美術鑑賞#137367(50題)

115年 - 115-1 專技高考_藥師(一)：藥學(一)(包括藥理學與藥物化學)（重複）#137365(80題)

115年 - 115-1 專技高考_物理治療師：物理治療技術學（包括電療學、熱療學、操作治療學與輔具學）（重複）#137362(80題)

115年 - 115-1 專技高考_牙醫師(二)：牙醫學(四)（包括口腔顎面外科學、牙科放射線學等科目及其相關臨床實例與醫學倫理）#137358(80題)

115年 - 115-1 專技高考_牙醫師(一)：牙醫學(一)（包括口腔解剖學、牙體形態學、口腔組織與胚胎學、生物化學等科目及其臨床相關知識）#137357(80題)

115年 - 115-1 專技高考_藥師(一)：藥學(二)(包括藥物分析與生藥學(含中藥學))#137356(80題)

最新試題

40.衛星定位測量之原理為(A)角度前方交會 (B)角度後方交會 (C)距離前方交會(D)距離後方交會。

39.GNSS全球導航定位系統除美國的GPS外，下列何者為非？(A)歐盟的GALILEO (B)日本的QZSS (C)中國大陸的BEIDOU (D)俄羅斯的GLONASS。

38.直接由GNSS測量之高程為(A)正高 (B)力高 (C)正常高 (D)椭球高。

最新申論題

4. 您認為鑄件產生氣孔之主要原因為何？

3. 試述機械造糢之優點。

2. 台灣鑄造產業未來發展趨勢為何？

最新課程

這是我的課程

講師：陳耘得

簡介：這是測試

123

講師：陳耘得

簡介：12312312

123123

講師：陳耘得

簡介：123123

最新主題筆記

民法編債第 736 條

課程：民法編債
章節：第二章各種之債第二十三節和解

描述：稱和解者，謂當事人約定，互相讓步，以終止爭執或防止爭執發生之契約。

民法編債第 737 條

課程：民法編債
章節：第二章各種之債第二十三節和解

描述：和解有使當事人所拋棄之權利消滅及使當事人取得和解契約所訂明權利之效力。

民法編債第 738 條

課程：民法編債
章節：第二章各種之債第二十三節和解

描述：和解不得以錯誤為理由撤銷之。但有左列事項之一者，不在此限：一、和解所依據之文件，事後發見為偽造或變...

最新討論

221 企業為了增進其對社會大眾與政府的關係，應採用 (A)產品廣告 (B)個人推銷 (C)促銷活動 (D)公共關係

19. 閱讀下列對話，判斷(甲)、(乙)依序最適合填入的詞語為何？ (A) 椿萱並茂／鶯遷喬木 (B) 福壽全歸／鶯遷喬木 (C) 椿萱並茂／蓬蓽生輝 (D) 福壽全歸／蓬蓽生輝

25.關於書信，下列何者敘述正確？ (A) 用於對平輩的提稱語，可用：青鑒、青覽、如晤、如握、如面、收覽、知悉、知之。 (B) 用於對晚輩的結尾祝候語，可用：敬請教安、祗請道安、叩請絳安。 (C) 信封的寫作，在中路直式信封寫受信人姓名，稱對方為「○○○先生」時，「先生」二字要寫小或偏側。如稱對方的職銜，則名字通常寫在職銜之下，則職銜要寫小或偏右書寫，名字絕不可寫小或偏側。 (D) 信封的啟封詞要視受信人的身分來使用。如對親族長輩用「福啟」、「安啟」；用於一般長輩用「鈞啟」、「賜啟」；平輩用「臺啟」、「大啟」。

5 模板工程施工中有無收頭困難之處，係下列何項施工的要領中需說明檢討項目？ (A) 設計圖及施工說明書之檢討事項 (B) 施工作業說明書之編制內容 (C) 施工計畫內容 (D) 施工圖送審計畫

複選題II. Passage Completion (20%) Directions: For each blank in the passage, choose a sentence (A~H) that fits the context best. Passage 1 The recent controversy surrounding “Shy Girl,” a novel withdrawn by its publisher after readers detected signs of artificial intelligence involvement, has ignited a fierce debate about the future of literature. When large language models (LLMs) attempt creative writing, the resulting prose often oscillates between flat and lurid. It typically features excessive, clunky metaphors and verbless, staccato sentences. For literary purists, these stylistic glitches are symptomatic of a profound metaphysical void. (1) Without genuine experiences or emotions, they argue, a bot can never develop an authentic voice or bridge the gap between human minds. However, the assumption that human creation is inherently superior overlooks an uncomfortable truth. (2) If we compare an LLM’s output to a masterpiece by Vladimir Nabokov, the machine’s text inevitably appears wooden. Yet, when pitted against a generic airport thriller, AI-generated prose can seem remarkably competent. Furthermore, the publishing industry often thrives on derivative content, marketing new books as mere hybrids of previous bestsellers. The case of “Shy Girl” perfectly illustrates this blurred line. Despite the ensuing scandal, online reviews indicate that many readers genuinely enjoyed the book. (3) In fact, some genre novelists are already openly utilizing bots to bypass the grunt work of writing, inputting established tropes to generate content. As these models rapidly improve, we may soon see a market where readers request highly customized fiction tailored to their exact preferences. Meanwhile, the ethical and legal battles are just beginning. Writers are justifiably aggrieved that their original works were ingested without consent to train their soulless competitors. (4) To protect human authors, some publishers are banking on certification schemes to guarantee that a book was written by an organic human being. However, as AI tools become ubiquitous in research and editing, this binary categorization may eventually collapse. Ultimately, the question is not merely whether a brilliant human writer can outperform a machine. The truly salient issue is an economic one. (5) The moral of this literary controversy is not that AI writing should be outright banned; rather, human authors must find a way to commercially and artistically outcompete it. (AB) Even if human genius remains unmatched, it is uncertain whether enough readers will pay a premium to sustain the traditional publishing industry. (AC) Because AI lacks a soul, it is fundamentally incapable of the fraught exercise of freedom that defines true art. (AD) Consequently, class-action lawsuits are currently underway to demand compensation for this omnivorous form of plagiarism. (AE) Although the accused author ultimately confessed to utilizing algorithms, she maintained that the software merely assisted with minor grammatical corrections. (BC) The reality is that a significant portion of human-authored commercial fiction is itself highly formulaic and lacking in originality. (BD) Furthermore, historical evidence suggests that every major technological disruption initially faces fierce, yet ultimately futile, resistance from traditionalists. (BE) This phenomenon suggests that a substantial segment of the reading public remains completely unfazed by undeclared machine involvement. (CD) To combat this trend, literary agencies have collectively agreed to boycott any manuscripts suspected of lacking organic human authorship. 1.

複選題2.