最新資料

系統分類學

生物多樣性科學

臺灣區域地質

115年 - 115 新北市政府環境保護局_儲備清潔隊員甄試試題題庫：環保常識類 301-350#137628(50題)

115年 - 115 新北市政府環境保護局_儲備清潔隊員甄試試題題庫：環保常識類 251-300#137627(50題)

115年 - 115 新北市政府環境保護局_儲備清潔隊員甄試試題題庫：環保常識類 201-250#137626(50題)

115年 - 115 新北市政府環境保護局_儲備清潔隊員甄試試題題庫：環保常識類 151-200#137625(50題)

115年 - 115 新北市政府環境保護局_儲備清潔隊員甄試試題題庫：環保常識類 101-150#137624(50題)

115年 - 115 新北市政府環境保護局_儲備清潔隊員甄試試題題庫：環保常識類 51-100#137623(50題)

115年 - [無官方正解]115 國立臺灣大學_ 碩士班招生考試試題：生物化學(一般生物化學)#137622(50題)

115年 - 115 國立臺灣大學_ 碩士班招生考試試題：普通生物學(B)#137620(4題)

115年 - 115 國立臺灣大學_ 碩士班招生考試試題：生物化學(B)#137619(11題)

115年 - 115 新制多益閱讀測驗第九回#137560(100題)

50. A teacher follows a sequence of "I Do (Modeling), We Do (Guided Practice), You Do (Independent Practice)" to help students master a new sentence pattern. This technique is primarily referred to as: (A) Scaffolding (B) Rote Learning (C) Inductive Discovery (D) Peer Correction

49. During a lesson, a teacher uses "Exit Slips" to check student understanding. She uses this data to modify her teaching plan for the next day. This is an example of: (A) Summative Assessment (B) Placement Assessment (C) Formative Assessment (D) Diagnostic Assessment

48. A teacher provides "i + 1" input—language that is just slightly beyond the students' current level of competence—to ensure they are challenged but not overwhelmed. This aligns with which of Krashen's hypotheses? (A) The Affective Filter Hypothesis (B) The Natural Order Hypothesis (C) The Input Hypothesis (D) The Monitor Hypothesis

IV. Design a worksheet for the following passage. Before your design, please specify your teaching foci and expected learning outcomes in 100 words.            There's a myth that to be a good leader, you need to be the smartest person in the room. As a result, many leaders struggle to admit that they don't have all the answers. They're reluctant to ask for help and end up struggling in silence. This reluctance is normal—it's a fear-based response to not wanting to look incompetent to your team or superiors. But there is a way you can ask for help that strengthens your position as a leader, rather than undermines it.           Reluctance to ask for help isn't just pride: it's often about perception. And this concern isn't entirely unfounded. One study found that male leaders risked being perceived as less competent when they asked for a lot of help. In contrast, their female counterparts in the same study didn't experience a significant drop in perceived competence when seeking help.           However, researchers cautioned that it isn't actually whether or not you ask for help, but how you ask. The same study noted that asking for help is critical for leaders to learn and improve. And the benefits of asking for help far outweigh the perceived risks. Harvard Business School researchers Alison Wood Brooks and Francesca Gino found that our mindset around seeking guidance is misguided. We might think that others will see us as less capable, but the opposite is true. In their study, Brooks and Gino found that when we ask others for advice, they view us as more competent. It signals that we value their expertise and don't overestimate ourselves, which is a sign of self-awareness. Moving beyond perceptions, asking for help is also likely to yield better performance results. By utilizing the knowledge, expertise, and insight of your team, you expand your collective problem-solving capacity. Leveraging people's strengths to solve complex problems is the hallmark of a competent leader.           There's a term for what effective leaders do when they admit they don't know everything: strategic vulnerability. Rather than appearing inept or oversharing indiscriminately, asking questions positions you to lead through vulnerability. That's because you demonstrate that it has a purpose, which is to empower others, utilize their expertise, build trust, and spark collective solutions.           Harvard Professor Amy Edmondson, a leading expert on psychological safety, says the simple admission of "I might miss something here, I need to hear from you" lays a foundation of a psychologically safe environment. By modeling fallibility—not ineptitude, you create an environment where people feel safe to speak up, ask questions, and share their opinions and ideas. These are all the fundamental elements of a high-performing team.           As Edmondson highlights in her research, an environment with high levels of psychological safety is one with fewer mistakes, less duplication, and less fear and anxiety. When you ask questions as a leader, you appear accessible and approachable. This creates the space for others to do the same, fast-tracking the discovery and recovery from mistakes or potentially more fatal decisions.           As a leader, you set the tone: what you do becomes the behaviors that you accept, which your team then reinforces. Asking questions models curiosity and humility. When people feel like you value their input, they can see how their contributions matter to the bigger picture. This builds trust, loyalty, and a sense of meaningfulness into the everyday functions of work. Strategic vulnerability—when you do it right—flips the script from looking incompetent to empowering your team. It also beats pretending you have all the answers.

III. Based on the prompt below, write a model essay in 250 words (10%), and design a lesson plan for a 4-period writing class (15%). Your lesson plan should include the rationale, objectives, materials, teaching procedures, and assessment methods. 提示：近年來養寵物的風氣在臺灣日漸普遍，而寵物在人們生活中的角色也與過去不同。請以此為主題，並參照下列圖片，寫一篇英文作文，文分兩段。第一段描述這些圖片中所呈現的現象；第二段則根據你自身的經驗或觀察，說明此現象的原因以及可能的影響。

II. Design FIVE integrated reading questions for the new General Scholastic Ability Test (新型學測混合題型). Include at least three different types (e.g., multiple-choice, matching, table completion, short-answer, true/false, blank-filling). The article doesn't need to be rewritten. Provide the correct answer for each question. (25%)          The increasingly early blooming of cherry blossoms has become a striking and observable sign of climate change. Drawing on a remarkable 1,200-year record from Kyoto, scientists have found that the timing of cherry blossom blooms has shifted significantly—now occurring nearly two weeks earlier than in the mid-19th century. This extensive historical dataset provides strong evidence that today's climate conditions are unlike anything previously experienced, surpassing earlier fluctuations such as the Medieval Warm Period and the Little Ice Age.          This shift is largely driven by global warming, which is primarily caused by human activities such as the combustion of fossil fuels. Rising temperatures have accelerated the arrival of spring, leading to earlier flowering not only in Kyoto but also in other regions, including Washington, D.C. Although scientists in the United States have identified a consistent trend toward earlier blooming, they have not yet conclusively attributed it to human-induced climate change, partly because other factors, such as the urban heat island effect, may also play a role. In contrast, Kyoto's long-term records enable researchers to directly connect earlier bloom dates to anthropogenic climate change.          Recent data further corroborates this pattern. Kyoto experienced record-breaking early blooms in 2020, 2021, and 2023, and research indicates that climate change has already advanced peak bloom timing by approximately 11 days. Under moderate emissions scenarios, projections suggest that blossoms could appear nearly another week earlier by the end of the century.          These changes are not merely visual; they carry serious ecological implications. Earlier blooming may disrupt the synchronization between flowers and their pollinators, while also increasing the risk of damage from unexpected late frosts. The consequences extend beyond ornamental trees. Fruit-bearing species such as apples and peaches face similar challenges, particularly if warmer winters fail to provide the cold conditions necessary for proper dormancy. Without sufficient chilling periods, some trees may not flower at all, posing risks to agricultural production.         At the same time, cherry blossoms continue to hold both scientific and cultural importance. They serve as valuable indicators for tracking environmental change while also symbolizing renewal and seasonal transition. However, their increasingly early appearance underscores the urgency of reducing carbon emissions to mitigate the most severe consequences of climate change.

【警鴿心智圖】刑法分則-財產法益（三）

講師：小摩喵(課程：警鴿系列)

簡介：本課程以清晰的心智圖呈現複雜的法律概念，幫助你快速掌握核心要點！無論你是法律系學生、司法考試備考生，...

【國考助手】2025警察法規(下冊)：行政執行法、社會秩序維護法

講師：最佳解

簡介：筆者綜合警特三等、四等考試、警校教師、讀書會共筆、自身實務等經驗，讓想考警察的非本科系生或想考升官等...

牙醫學(二)口腔病理學 歷年考古題總整理

講師：D_exam_100

簡介：前言: 世上疾病如此多，準備考試的時間卻如此少。 因此，我們需要用極有效率的方式來面對國考。 自身經驗...

此次呢

描述：想開開心心

烷類的鹵化反應

課程：【學士後中醫】化學 (普通化學、有機化學)
章節：化學

時態

描述：國中英文

34. 校園霸凌是目前全球兒童及青少年面臨的問題之一，且對兒童及青少年的身心發展影響甚鉅。對校園霸凌的相關描述， 下列何者錯誤？(A)加害者可能為個體，也可能是一群人，情境對象中可能有受害者、旁觀者、煽動霸凌者、保護者。 (B)學生間是相對權力不均等，常是強凌弱或大欺小的重覆性行為。(C)是否為霸凌行為係尊重疑似被行為人的主觀感受， 主要由受害者的認定為主。(D)依據「校園霸凌防制準則」，疑似校園霸凌的被霸凌人或其法定代理人可以向行為人發生 行為時所屬學校提出申請調查。

4. M. Savickas 的生涯建構論（Career Construction Theory），主要包含哪三個核心架構？(A)生涯定錨（Career Anchor）、職業適配性（Person-Environment Fit）、生命主題（Life Theme）(B)生涯定錨（Career Anchor）、生涯適應力（Career Adaptability）、性別社會化（Gender Socialization）(C)職業人格（Vocational Personality）、職業適配性（Person-Environment Fit）、性別社會化（Gender Socialization）(D)職業人格（Vocational Personality）、生涯適應力（Career Adaptability）、生命主題（Life Theme）

33. 在運動表現中，覺醒程度與表現之間呈現在 U 原理之非線性關係，當覺醒處於適當水準時，表現最為理想。下列何者最符合此一關係？ (A) 當覺醒到達中間值，表現就會達到高峰 (B) 當覺醒到達高峰值，表現就會達到高峰 (C) 當覺醒到達中間值，表現就會達到中上 (D) 當覺醒到達高峰值，表現就會達到中上

38. 全球氣候變遷，各國不斷出現新的高溫紀錄，熱傷害處理成為體育教師必要課題。熱傷害按嚴重程度由輕到重可分為？ (A) 熱痙孿、熱衰竭、中暑 (B) 熱痙孿、中暑、熱衰竭 (C) 中暑、熱痙孿、熱衰竭 (D) 熱衰竭、熱痙孿、中暑

41. 某學校體育組在籌備運動會過程中，教師間因意見分歧，從潛在不滿逐漸轉為可察覺的認知衝突，並伴隨情緒反應，最終演變為公開對立並產生結果。依據 Louis R. Pondy 的衝突歷程觀點，下列何者最符合上述情境？ (A) 潛在衝突、覺察衝突、感覺衝突、外顯衝突、衝突結果 (B) 潛在衝突、覺察衝突、轉型衝突、領導衝突、行政衝突 (C) 轉型衝突、領導衝突、規避衝突、管理衝突、衝突結果 (D) 規避衝突、管理衝突、衝突結果、領導衝突、行政衝突

1. 依公司法規定，下列何者股份有限公司人員，於執行職務範圍內，亦為負責人？ 甲、檢查人；乙、 重整人；丙、發起人；丁、發言人 (A)僅甲、乙、丙 (B)僅乙、丙、丁 (C)僅甲、丙、丁 (D)僅甲、乙、丁