最新資料

【段考】國一數學

【段考】國二數學

【段考】國三數學

115年 - 115 公共工程品管人員(機電班)題庫 451-500（2026/09/15 更新）#144993(50題)

115年 - 115 公共工程品管人員(機電班)題庫 401-450（2026/09/15 更新）#144990(50題)

115年 - 115 公共工程品管人員(機電班)題庫 351-400（2026/09/15 更新）#144989(50題)

115年 - 115 公共工程品管人員(機電班)題庫 301-350（2026/09/15 更新）#144987(50題)

115年 - 115 公共工程品管人員(機電班)題庫 251-300（2026/09/15 更新）#144986(50題)

115年 - 115 公共工程品管人員(機電班)題庫 201-250（2026/09/15 更新）#144985(50題)

115年 - 115 公共工程品管人員(機電班)題庫 151-200（2026/09/15 更新）#144984(50題)

115年 - 115 公共工程品管人員(機電班)題庫 101-150（2026/09/15 更新）#144980(50題)

115年 - 115 公共工程品管人員(機電班)題庫 51-100（2026/09/15 更新）#144979(50題)

115年 - 115 公共工程品管人員(機電班)題庫 1-50（2026/09/15 更新）#144977(50題)

15. 下列何種免疫細胞涉及宿主(Host)先天免疫反應(innate immunity)和後天免疫反應(adaptive immunity)之橋樑： (A)T lymphocytes　　(B)neutrophils　　(C)NK cells (D)mast cells　　　　(5)macrophages

14. 身體對抗細胞內寄生之細菌需仰賴： (A)polymorphonuclear leukocytes　　　(B)interferon (C)humoral immunity　　　　　 　　(D)cell-mediated immunity

13. 下列何種細菌主要在細胞內繁殖： (A) Listeria monocytogenes and Mycobacterium bovis (B) Mycobacterium bovis and Streptococcus bovis (C) Listeria monocytogenes and Enterococcus faecalis (D) Streptococcus bovis and Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae

II. Essay Writing (50%) In the last two years, the Covid-19 pandemic has willy-nilly forced us to enter a new era for distant learning wherein teachers and students alike have been faced with challenges and changes in schooling. While many may have embraced the new way of schooling they have encountered, relishing the freedom and flexibility offered by online learning, others may have suffered a lot from the losses of real contacts with teachers and peers in a classroom setting, which are essential parts of all face-to-face meetings. Write an essay in which you depict the effects of the Covid-19 outbreak in education, either focusing on the positive, or the negative outcomes of distant learning during or after the pandemic.

I. Critical Thinking and Writing (50%)Below is an excerpt selected from Peter Wingrove's (2022) work published in English for Specific Purposes. Discuss (1)what the rationale(s) and goal(s) of this paper and (2)summarize the article in less than 150 words.This research article contributes to the literature which characterises TED talks and academic lectures in terms of linguistic features, with the aim of informing pedagogy. The primary motivation for this research is the introduction of TED talks into educational settings, particularly within English for Academic Purposes (EAP), where TED talks are recommended for academic listening practice (De Chazal, 2014) and sometimes conflated with academic discourse within research (e.g. Abdulrahman, 2017; Elk, 2014; Takaesu, 2014). Moreover, TED talks feature prominently in contemporary textbooks marketed at university students, such as the Keynote (Dummet, Stephenson, Bohlke, & Lansford, 2016–2018), Perspectives (Barber, Dellar, Jeffries, & Lansford, 2018), and 21st Century Communication (Baker, Blass, Williams, Bonesteel, & Lee, 2017) series. The underlying presupposition is that TED talks are a form of academic discourse, or at least suitably similar to act as a substitute in EAP classes. This assumption is not unfounded as certain features of TED talks suggest at least overlap with academic discourses. For instance, TED hosts a range of speakers, including entrepreneurs, politicians, writers, artists, and notably, a number of academics (Cassidy et al., 2013). In terms of topic, the TED website uses a series of content tags to organise the talks, listing six main tags: technology, entertainment, design, business, science, and global issues; and over 400 minor tags, a set of which denote academic content such as chemistry, biology, math, history, and philosophy. Academic lexis is a crucial component of academic language, linked to successful academic listening and performance. Interview and survey data has found that many L2 students struggle to understand academic lectures in English (Mulligan & Kirkpatrick, 2000), with limited vocabulary knowledge reported to cause comprehension difficulties (Ali, 2020; Yeh, 2014). Moreover, prior studies have demonstrated a correlation between vocabulary knowledge and academic performance (Masrai & Milton, 2018; Roche & Harrington, 2013) and the use of academic vocabulary has been found to increase in student writing as they progress through academia, suggesting they are an important feature (Durrant, 2016). Therefore, academic vocabulary knowledge appears to be important for academic listening, academic writing, and academic performance overall. Comparing TED talks and academic lectures in terms of academic lexis gives an indication of how useful TED talks are for preparing students for the academic vocabulary demands of lectures. Prior research has made some progress in this direction. A previous study found that the Academic Vocabulary List (AVL; Gardner & Davies, 2014) covered 6.56% of TED talks on average, compared to 9.35% of academic lectures (Wingrove, 2017). However, this research was limited in terms of corpus size (49 talks), scope (only technology, design, and entertainment talks) and in the measure of academic content, which only considered written academic vocabulary. As the use of AVL items has been found to vary substantially across disciplines (Durrant, 2016), the limited number of topics in this study is a notable limitation. Moreover, academic lexis has been captured in a number of ways, using differing criteria and aims. Therefore, in order to inform the suitable use of TED Talks in ESP contexts, the current study analyses the coverage of three lists of academic lexis across two corpora, which were designed for this study: the TED Talk Corpus (TTC; n = 2,483, tokens = 5,068,781) and the Open Yale Courses Lecture Corpus (OYCLC; n = 2,483, tokens = 5,068,781). The TTC includes over 400 topic tags and the OYCLC covers a broad range of academic disciplines. Academic lexis is defined by the Academic Word List (AWL; Coxhead, 2000), the Academic Vocabulary List (AVL; Gardner & Davies, 2014), and the Academic Spoken Word List levels 2–4 (ASWL; Dang, Coxhead & Webb 2017). To investigate the extent and the ways in which TED talks are different from OYCLC lectures in terms of academic lexis, a corpus-based approach (see Tognini-Bonelli, 2001) is taken to answer the following research questions: (1) Do TED talks differ from OYCLC lectures in terms of academic lexis? (2) To what extent are these differences present across the different disciplinary categories? and (3) Which academic lexes are frequent in TED talks and how does this compare with frequent academic lexes in lectures?

題目八:【10分】請說明職業衛生護理人員之角色，至少3項.

qweqweqwe

講師：陳耘得

簡介：qweqwewqe

qweqweqwe

講師：陳耘得

簡介：qweqweqweqwe

rqweqwe

講師：陳耘得

簡介：qweqweq

第44條

課程：警察法規(下)
章節：社會秩序維護法第33-62條(處罰程序)

描述：第44條(輕行為之逕行處分)

第45條

課程：警察法規(下)
章節：社會秩序維護法第33-62條(處罰程序)

描述：第45條(其他應移請裁定之案件)

第46條

課程：警察法規(下)
章節：社會秩序維護法第33-62條(處罰程序)

描述：第46條(裁定書製作、記載)

37. Why does the author mention "students who stayed for hours after buying inexpensive drinks" in paragraph 2？ (A)To suggest that Louisa should ban university students from its stores (B)To show that Louisa's prices were too low to be sustainable for young employees (C)To illustrate the popularity of Louisa among young people on university campuses (D)To explain how the store environment unintentionally changed the brand's customer base

38. According to paragraph 3, Louisa has done all of the following as part of its transformation EXCEPT: (A)added food items to its menu (B)expanded its central kitchen operations (C)closed underperforming franchise locations (D)launched new restaurant brands in different cuisines

9 依司法院解釋意旨，下列何者違憲侵害憲法保障之工作權？ (A)不動產估價師法禁止不動產估價師設立分事務所(B)藥事法限制醫師藥品調劑權(C)藥師法規定藥師執業處所應以一處為限(D)中醫師特考有零分或專業科目平均成績或特定科目成績未達規定者不予及格

10 依司法院解釋意旨及憲法法庭裁判，關於訴訟權保障之敘述，下列何者錯誤？ (A)向法院提起訴訟，請求依正當法律程序公平審判，以獲及時有效救濟之機會，為訴訟權保障之核心內容(B)審級制度屬訴訟權保障之核心內容，故任何訴訟事件均得上訴於第三審(C)法官先後參與同一案件上下級審判之迴避，屬訴訟權保障之核心內容(D)法定法官原則為法治國家所依循之憲法原則，法院案件之分配不容恣意操控

38 下列何者並非訴願先行程序？ (A)稅捐稽徵法上之復查 (B)藥事法上之異議 (C)貿易法上之聲明異議 (D)公務人員保障法上之復審

三、115 年初衛生單位查獲某公司將橄欖油與芥花油以 1：25 比例混合後， 品名標示為 100% 純橄欖油，衛生單位可依違反食品安全衛生管理法之 何種條文並處以多少範圍之罰鍰？另請說明「市售包裝調合油外包裝品 名標示」之規定，依法該公司應如何正確標示品名與內容物組成？（20 分）