活動名稱
【解題達人! We want you!】
活動說明
阿摩站上可謂臥虎藏龍，阿摩發出200萬顆鑽石號召達人們來解題!
針對一些題目可能有疑問但卻缺少討論，阿摩主動幫大家尋找最佳解!
懸賞試題多達20萬題，快看看是否有自己拿手的科目試題，一旦你的回應被選為最佳解，一題即可獲得10顆鑽石。
懸賞時間結束後，只要摩友觀看你的詳解，每次也會得到10顆鑽石喔!
關於鑽石
如何使用:
- ✔懸賞試題詳解
- ✔購買私人筆記
- ✔購買懸賞詳解
- ✔兌換VIP
(1000顆鑽石可換30天VIP) - ✔兌換現金
(50000顆鑽石可換NT$4,000)
如何獲得:
- ✔解答懸賞題目並被選為最佳解
- ✔撰寫私人筆記販售
- ✔撰寫詳解販售(必須超過10讚)
- ✔直接購買 (至站內商城選購)
** 所有鑽石收入，都會有10%的手續費用
近期考題
請依下文回答第 11 題至第 15 題Before children can read, the process of comprehending text begins when someone reads a picture book tothem. Young children listen to the words, see the pictures in the book, and may start to 11 the words onthe page with the words they are hearing and the ideas these words represent. In order to learn comprehension 12 , students need modeling, practice, and feedback. For example, when students preview a text, they tapinto what they already know and that knowledge will help them understand the text they are about to read. Inother words, their 13 knowledge provides a framework for any new information they read. Moreover,when students make predictions about the text they are about to read, this exercise sets up 14 based ontheir prior knowledge about similar topics. As they read, students may mentally revise their prediction as theygain more information. In addition, identifying the main ideas and making a summary requires studentsto 15 what points are important and put those points in their own words. Furthermore, asking andanswering questions about a text is another strategy that helps students focus on the meaning of the text.Teachers can help by modeling both the process of asking good questions and strategies for finding the answersin the text.
【題組】12
(A) restrictions
(B) regulations
(C) simulations
(D) strategies
【題組】12
(A) restrictions
(B) regulations
(C) simulations
(D) strategies
Passage Two
Questions 57 to 61 are based on the following passage.
In the college-admissions wars, we parents are the true fights. We are pushing our kids to get good grades, take SAT preparatory courses and build resumes so they can get into the college of our first choice. I’ve twice been to the wars, and as I survey the battlefield, something different is happening. We see our kids’ college background as e prize demonstrating how well we’ve raised them. But we can’t acknowledge that our obsession(痴迷) is more about us than them. So we’ve contrived various justifications that turn out to be half-truths, prejudices or myths. It actually doesn’t matter much whether Aaron and Nicole go to Stanford.
We have a full-blown prestige panic; we worry that there won’t be enough prizes to go around. Fearful parents urge their children to apply to more schools than ever. Underlying the hysteria(歇斯底里) is the belief that scarce elite degrees must be highly valuable. Their graduates must enjoy more success because they get a better education and develop better contacts. All that is plausible——and mostly wrong. We haven’t found any convincing evidence that selectivity or prestige matters. Selective schools don’t systematically employ better instructional approaches than less selective schools. On two measures——professors’ feedback and the number of essay exams——selective schools do slightly worse.
By some studies, selective schools do enhance their graduates’ lifetime earnings. The gain is reckoned at 2-4% for every 100-poinnt increase in a school’s average SAT scores. But even this advantage is probably a statistical fluke(偶然). A well-known study examined students who got into highly selective schools and then went elsewhere. They earned just as much as graduates from higher-status schools.
Kids count more than their colleges.Getting into yale may signify intellgence,talent and Ambition. But it’s not the only indicator and,paradoxically,its significance is declining.The reason:so many similar people go elsewhere.Getting into college is not life only competiton.Old-boy networks are breaking down.princeton economist Alan Krueger studied admissions to one top Ph.D.program.High scores on the GRE helpd explain who got in;degrees of prestigious universities didn’t.
So,parents,lighten up.the stakes have been vastly exaggerated.up to a point,we can rationalize our pushiness.America is a competitive society;our kids need to adjust to that.but too much pushiness can be destructive.the very ambition we impose on our children may get some into Harvard but may also set them up for disappointment.one study found that,other things being equal,graduates of highly selective schools experienced more job dissatisfaction.They may have been so conditioned to deing on top that anything less disappoints.
注意 此部分试题请在答题卡2上作答。
【題組】59.What does the author mean by kids count more than their college(Line1,para.4?
(A).Continuing education is more important to a person success.
(B).A person happiness should be valued more than their education.
(C).Kids actual abilities are more importang than their college background.
(D).What kids learn at college cannot keep up with job market requirements.
【題組】59.What does the author mean by kids count more than their college(Line1,para.4?
(A).Continuing education is more important to a person success.
(B).A person happiness should be valued more than their education.
(C).Kids actual abilities are more importang than their college background.
(D).What kids learn at college cannot keep up with job market requirements.
15.A：ワクチンを _________ 。
B：打たなくてもいいですが、打った方が安心です。
(A)うらなくてもいいですか
(B)うったわけではありませんか
(C)うたなければなりませんか
(D)うってはいけませんか
B：打たなくてもいいですが、打った方が安心です。
(A)うらなくてもいいですか
(B)うったわけではありませんか
(C)うたなければなりませんか
(D)うってはいけませんか
【非選題】
【題組】（二）內部稽核在內部控制的角色。【15 分】
題目一：
內部稽核功能是全企業風險管理架構的重要一環。甚少有功能像內部稽核般瞭解企業的
核心經營目的與方式。當與各界不同的利益相關者(Stakeholders)的需求調整時，內部稽核是
有效管理控制，專業積極風險管理，落實公司治理，以及持續營運過程改善的主要驅動力。
國際內部稽核協會(IIA, The Institute of Internal Auditors)的理事會，在 1995 年英國霸菱
銀行集團發生李森事件及 1997 年亞洲爆發金融風暴後，認為有必要對內部稽核的角色、目
的及任務作一個新的界定，於是在 1999
年
6 月重新定義內部稽核如下：
「內部稽核是一項獨立、客觀的確認及諮詢活動，其目的在增加價值及改善組織的營
運。內部稽核以系統化及紀律化的方法評估與改善風險管理、控制與治理程序的有效性，以
協助企業達成其目的。」
新的定義不僅顯示內部稽核專業已產生改變，它更引導內部稽核人員朝向一個更大、更
具影響力的角色。
請依據以上國際內部稽核協會對內部稽核的新定義，說明：
【題組】（二）內部稽核在內部控制的角色。【15 分】