活動名稱
【解題達人! We want you!】
活動說明
阿摩站上可謂臥虎藏龍，阿摩發出200萬顆鑽石號召達人們來解題!
針對一些題目可能有疑問但卻缺少討論，阿摩主動幫大家尋找最佳解!
懸賞試題多達20萬題，快看看是否有自己拿手的科目試題，一旦你的回應被選為最佳解，一題即可獲得10顆鑽石。
懸賞時間結束後，只要摩友觀看你的詳解，每次也會得到10顆鑽石喔!
關於鑽石
如何使用:
- ✔懸賞試題詳解
- ✔購買私人筆記
- ✔購買懸賞詳解
- ✔兌換VIP
(1000顆鑽石可換30天VIP) - ✔兌換現金
(50000顆鑽石可換NT$4,000)
如何獲得:
- ✔解答懸賞題目並被選為最佳解
- ✔撰寫私人筆記販售
- ✔撰寫詳解販售(必須超過10讚)
- ✔直接購買 (至站內商城選購)
** 所有鑽石收入，都會有10%的手續費用
近期考題
"記號，表示
Passage Two
Questions 57 to 61 are based on the following passage.
In the college-admissions wars, we parents are the true fights. We are pushing our kids to get good grades, take SAT preparatory courses and build resumes so they can get into the college of our first choice. I’ve twice been to the wars, and as I survey the battlefield, something different is happening. We see our kids’ college background as e prize demonstrating how well we’ve raised them. But we can’t acknowledge that our obsession(痴迷) is more about us than them. So we’ve contrived various justifications that turn out to be half-truths, prejudices or myths. It actually doesn’t matter much whether Aaron and Nicole go to Stanford.
We have a full-blown prestige panic; we worry that there won’t be enough prizes to go around. Fearful parents urge their children to apply to more schools than ever. Underlying the hysteria(歇斯底里) is the belief that scarce elite degrees must be highly valuable. Their graduates must enjoy more success because they get a better education and develop better contacts. All that is plausible——and mostly wrong. We haven’t found any convincing evidence that selectivity or prestige matters. Selective schools don’t systematically employ better instructional approaches than less selective schools. On two measures——professors’ feedback and the number of essay exams——selective schools do slightly worse.
By some studies, selective schools do enhance their graduates’ lifetime earnings. The gain is reckoned at 2-4% for every 100-poinnt increase in a school’s average SAT scores. But even this advantage is probably a statistical fluke(偶然). A well-known study examined students who got into highly selective schools and then went elsewhere. They earned just as much as graduates from higher-status schools.
Kids count more than their colleges.Getting into yale may signify intellgence,talent and Ambition. But it’s not the only indicator and,paradoxically,its significance is declining.The reason:so many similar people go elsewhere.Getting into college is not life only competiton.Old-boy networks are breaking down.princeton economist Alan Krueger studied admissions to one top Ph.D.program.High scores on the GRE helpd explain who got in;degrees of prestigious universities didn’t.
So,parents,lighten up.the stakes have been vastly exaggerated.up to a point,we can rationalize our pushiness.America is a competitive society;our kids need to adjust to that.but too much pushiness can be destructive.the very ambition we impose on our children may get some into Harvard but may also set them up for disappointment.one study found that,other things being equal,graduates of highly selective schools experienced more job dissatisfaction.They may have been so conditioned to deing on top that anything less disappoints.
注意 此部分试题请在答题卡2上作答。
【題組】59.What does the author mean by kids count more than their college(Line1,para.4?
(A).Continuing education is more important to a person success.
(B).A person happiness should be valued more than their education.
(C).Kids actual abilities are more importang than their college background.
(D).What kids learn at college cannot keep up with job market requirements.
【題組】59.What does the author mean by kids count more than their college(Line1,para.4?
(A).Continuing education is more important to a person success.
(B).A person happiness should be valued more than their education.
(C).Kids actual abilities are more importang than their college background.
(D).What kids learn at college cannot keep up with job market requirements.
【非選題】
【題組】2.Covid-19 vaccines
Section I: Short Answers
Instructions: Choose any five from the following list and briefly describe in English what you know about. (6 pts each)
Instructions: Choose any five from the following list and briefly describe in English what you know about. (6 pts each)
【題組】2.Covid-19 vaccines
【非選題】
【題組】(1)A、B 與 C 之行為是否構成違反證券交易法之犯罪規定？（15 分）
一、甲為股票已經在證券交易所上市之股份有限公司（以下簡稱甲公司），甲公司董事長 A，於民國 99 年間，與其弟 B（當時擔任甲公司董事兼總經理）共同謀議，透過由董事長 A 協議提供之人頭戶 C（為乙公司之債權人）向地方法院以每坪新臺幣 10 萬元之價格低價承受已拍賣三次均流標之乙公司土地。一個月之後再由 C 將
承受之土地以每坪新臺幣 50 萬元高價轉售給甲公司，造成甲公司因未循正常程序參與法院拍賣，A、B 與 C 藉此獲取價差高達新臺幣 2 億元，並因此減低甲公司年度盈餘，試說明下列問題：
【題組】(1)A、B 與 C 之行為是否構成違反證券交易法之犯罪規定？（15 分）
