學士後西醫-英文題庫下載題庫

上一題
Ⅲ. Reading Comprehension and Reasoning Skills: 60 points (SectionⅢconsists of six passages On a variety of topics. Each passage is followed by five questions. Please read the passages closely and answer the questions based on what is stated or implied.) 
【 單 選 題 】 共 六 篇 閱 讀 選 文 , 每 篇 文 章 五 題 , 每 題 2 分 , 共 30 題 , 答 錯 1 題 倒 扣 0﹒5 分 , 倒 扣 至 本 大 題 零 分 為 止 ﹔ 若 未 作 答 , 不 絡 分 亦 不 扣 分 。 
Reading 1
Iam most interested in the kinds of true war stories and war memories capacious enough to include the blood and guts as well as the boring and the quotidian﹒ True war stories acknowledge war﹁s true identity, which is that while war is hell, war is normal, too. War is both inhuman and human, as are its participants. Photographer Tod Papageorge’s American Sports, 1970: Or How We Spent the War 沁 Vietnam portrays war in exactly this fashion. The book features seventy photographs, all but one capturing American sporting events: the players and the fans, the press conferences and the team buses, the dugouts and the locker rooms, with the participants being men, women, young, old, black, white, ugly, beautiful. The last photograph is the one that does not depict a sporting event or its participants. It is of the War Memorial in Indianapolis, with these words on the facing page﹕ “In 1970, 4,221 American troops were killed in Vietnam.” This is horror as an appendix to the banal, which is how many civilians experience war. Papageorge suggests that even as American soldiers die abroad, life continues at home, an experience repeated decades later with America’s wars in the Middle East, which often hardly feel like wars at all in the United States. While O’Brien’s stories may be true war stories from a soldier’s point of view, Papageorge’s photos are true war stories from a civilian﹁s point of view. The spectacular gore of a certain kind of true war story distracts us from the dull hu of the war machine in which we live, a massive mechanism greased with banalities, bolted together by triviality, and enabled by passive consent. To tell and hear these kinds of banal and boring true war stories is necessary for what philosopher William James called “the war against war.” So far as we imagine wars to be dangerous (but thrilling), wars will notend﹒ Perhaps when we see how boring wars actually are, how war seeps into everyday life, then we might want to imagine stopping wars. The citizenry can end war at any time by refusing to go along with it, which is no easy matter---perhaps even utopia itself, versus the passive consent to the contemporary global dystopia of perpetual war.

【題組】23.Which of the following statements is ost likely what the author of the passage intends to claim when he quotes William James?
(A) There is no way to stop military conflicts at all since we need “the war against war”
(B) It’s important to imagine the war to be dangerous
(C)The portrayal of war as banal and boring, rather than thrilling, might better encourage the civilians to imagine stopping wars
(D) The spectacular gore of a certain kind of true war story is necessary for what William James calls “the war against war”
(E) What William James calls “the war against war” is a passive consent to the contemporary global dystopia of perpetual war.


答案:登入後觀看
難度: 計算中

10
 【站僕】摩檸Morning:有沒有達人來解釋一下?
倒數 2天 ,已有 1 則答案
Celeste 小五下 (2024/09/03):



(A) There is no way to stop military conflicts at all since we need "the war against war"(A) 根本無法阻止軍事衝突,因為我們需要「反戰的戰爭」

- 錯,因為詹姆斯並不 認為戰爭是不可避免的。相反,他認為我們可以 透過改變對戰爭的看法,來減少人們對戰爭的嚮 往。並且不要美化戰爭,就可以結束戰爭。




(B) It's important to imagine the war to be dangerous

- 雖然詹姆斯承認戰爭的危險性,但他的重點是找到一個道德等同於戰爭的東西,可以將同樣的能量和激情引導到建設性的方向。他並沒有強調將戰爭想像成危險是主要解決方案。
(C) The portrayal of war as banal and boring, rather than thrilling, might better encourage the civilians to imagine stopping wars
將戰爭描繪成平凡和無聊,而不是令人興奮,可能更能鼓勵平民想像停止戰爭。

詹姆斯認為,美化戰爭的興奮和英雄主義會延續其吸引力。相反,強調戰爭的平凡和可怕方面可以減少其吸引力,並促進更強的反戰情緒。
(D) The spectacular gore of a certain kind of true war story is necessary for what William James calls "the war against war真實戰爭故事的壯觀又血腥的場面是詹姆斯所謂「反戰的戰爭」所必需的

- 詹姆斯並不提倡使用壯觀的血腥場面來促進反戰情緒。相反,他建議將戰爭描繪成平凡可怕的,而不是令人興奮的,這樣更能有效地阻止戰爭。


(E) What William James calls "the war against war" is a passive consent to the contemporary global dystopia of perpetual war.


錯,威廉·詹姆斯的「反戰的戰爭」概念並不是對當代全球永續戰爭(perpetual war)的被動同意passive consent。
Dystopia,的意思是指一個想像中的社會或國家,在這裡人們生活在極大的痛苦或不公正之中,通常是極權主義或後末日的情景,這個詞來自希臘語的「dys-」(壞的)和「utopia」(烏托邦),意指一個反烏托邦的世界例如,許多小說和電影描繪的未來世界,充滿了壓迫、貧困和混亂,這些都是典型的反烏托邦場景。




0個讚
檢舉


Ⅲ. Reading Comprehension and Reasoning S..-阿摩線上測驗