3. How has Interpol responded to concerns about the misuse of its systems?
(A) By abolishing the Red Notice system entirely.
(B) By allowing individual officers to issue notices without review.
(C) By establishing a task force to ensure human rights compliance.
(D) By focusing exclusively on military interventions.

Passage A: The Evolution of Interpol and the Red Notice System
The International Criminal Police Organization (Interpol) represents a unique synthesis組織 of global cooperation and national sovereignty國家主權. At the heart of its operations is the "Red Notice," a mechanism機制 often misunderstood誤解 as an international arrest warrant. In reality, it is a request要求 to law enforcement執法機關 worldwide to locate and provisionally暫時地 arrest a person pending 等待extradition引渡. However, the system faces scrutiny審查 regarding potential有意地 political manipulation政治操作. "Article 3" of Interpol’s Constitution國際刑警組織規章 strictly嚴格地 forbids禁止 intervention干涉 in activities of a political, military, or racial character. Despite this, some regimes政權 are accused of被指控 utilizing notices to harass騷擾 dissidents持不同意見者. To counter抵制 this, Interpol implemented實施 a specialized task force to review審查 notices for compliance with遵守 human rights standards. As crime becomes more digitized數位化, the I-24/7 secure communication system has become the backbone 骨幹of border security邊境安全, yet the tension拉力 between efficient enforcement and individual個人 liberties自由 remains a delicate balancing act微妙的平衡.