8. The discovery of new DNA evidence served to completely ________ the suspect, proving beyond a shadow of a doubt that he was not present at the crime scene.
(A) inculpate
(B) exonerate
(C) castigate
(D) obfuscate
答案:登入後查看
統計: A(4), B(28), C(4), D(4), E(0) #3854933
統計: A(4), B(28), C(4), D(4), E(0) #3854933
詳解 (共 2 筆)
#7407845
題目解析
The discovery of new DNA evidence served to completely ________ the suspect, proving beyond a shadow of a doubt that he was not present at the crime scene.
新發現的 DNA 證據完全______了嫌犯,毫無疑問地證明他當時不在犯罪現場。
後面提到:
- proving ... he was not present at the crime scene
- 證明他不在案發現場
- 表示他是無罪的、被洗刷嫌疑的
因此應選:
✅ (B) exonerate = 證明無罪;洗清罪名
選項比較
(A) inculpate
- 歸罪於、證明有罪
- 與句意相反
例:
The evidence inculpated the defendant.
證據證明被告有罪。
(B) exonerate
- 使免罪、證明無罪
- ✔ 正確答案
例:
The DNA evidence exonerated him.
DNA 證據證明他無罪。
(C) castigate
- 嚴厲斥責
例:
The coach castigated the players.
教練嚴厲責罵球員。
(D) obfuscate
- 使模糊、使混淆
例:
The politician tried to obfuscate the issue.
那位政治人物試圖模糊焦點。
0
0