沒有 【段考】國一英文下學期 權限，請先開通．

沒有 【段考】國一英文下學期 權限，請先開通．

沒有 【段考】國一英文下學期 權限，請先開通．

沒有 【段考】國一英文下學期 權限，請先開通．

沒有 【段考】國一英文下學期 權限，請先開通．

沒有 【段考】國一英文下學期 權限，請先開通．

沒有 【段考】國一英文下學期 權限，請先開通．

沒有 【段考】國一英文下學期 權限，請先開通．

沒有 【段考】國一英文下學期 權限，請先開通．

一、英譯中 Translation: Translate the following news report into Chinese, including the title and the passage.（15 分） ABENOMICS: Overhyped, underappreciated In the 1980s Japan was a closely studied example of economic dynamism. In the decades since, it has commanded attention largely for its economic stagnation. After years of falling prices and fitful growth, Japan’s nominal GDP was roughly the same in 2015 as it was 20 years earlier. America’s grew by 134% in the same time period; even Italy’s went up by two-thirds. Now Japan is in the spotlight for a different reason: its attempts at economic resuscitation. To reflate Japan and reform it, Shinzo Abe, prime minister since December 2012, proposed the three “arrows” of what has become known as Abenomics: monetary stimulus, fiscal “flexibility” and structural reform. However, it has not only demonstrated how self-defeating fiscal austerity can be, particularly when it comes in the form of a tax on all consumers. Moreover, Abenomics has fallen short of its targets and its overblown rhetoric. That makes it easy to dismiss as a failure. In fact, it has shown that central banks and governments do have the capacity to stir a torpid economy. And in some senses, the hype was needed. Japan’s stagnation had become a self-fulfilling prophecy; Abenomics could succeed only if enough people believed it would. This is a final lesson that Japan’s economic experiment can impart to the rest of the world. Aim high.

二、中譯英 Translation: Translate the following into English, including the title and the passage.（15 分） 仇恨言論及其管制：歐洲人權法案判例分析 根據歐洲人權法院判決，關於何謂仇恨言論及應否與如何限制等議題，宜同時 從以下五個領域探討：政治爭議、宗教衝突、種族爭論、國家認同、性別特性等。 歐洲人權法院沒有給予仇恨言論明確的定義，然而判例指出納粹、法西斯、反猶太 人、極端言論、排除穆斯林或特定族群、以種族為基礎的威脅、訴諸暴力等，皆構 成仇恨言論。符合歐洲人權公約第 17 條關於禁止權力濫用的適用範圍。再者，法院 曾判決，對於構成具體威脅的仇恨言論可加諸預防性措施，而訴諸暴力的言論也可 以被禁止。學者和外交人士指出，歐洲人權法院不需要針對仇恨言論先劃定「禁區」， 也無需強調歐洲人權法案第 17 條的適用。而可以透過該公約第 10 條第 2 項及第 11 條第 2 項，來審查這些針對言論自由及集會結社自由的限制，是否有違比例原則。 

110年 - 台北市立景興國民中學109學年度第二學期七年級第一次定期評量∶ 英文#98336

109年 - 110年第二學期第二次七年級英文卷#98831

109年 - 2020高雄市市立大樹國中七年級109 下學期英文第一次段考(期中考)南一#98052

108年 - 108 臺南市立復興國中第二學期一年級第 3 次定期考英語科試題 範圍:南一版 B2 L5~R3#108439

108年 - 2019彰化縣縣立福興國中七年級108 下學期英文第三次段考(期末考)翰林#99466

108年 - 2019臺中市市立中港高中附設國中七年級108 下學期英文第一次段考(期中考)康軒#99465

108年 - 新北市立新莊國中108學年度第2學期第3次段考7年級語文(英語)領域試題卷#99346

108年 - 2019彰化縣縣立大同國中七年級108 下學期英文第三次段考(期末考)南一#95742

108年 - 2019臺北市市立民族國中七年級108 下學期英文第一次段考(期中考)南一#95741

108年 - 2019臺中市市立中港高中附設國中七年級108 下學期英文第二次段考(期中考)康軒#95712