1. 隨著時代與環境的改變，該台灣學校有許多困境待突破。例如，因為進修不易、誘因不高， 導致教師流動率高。

2. 過勞死是一種職業性的突然死亡，其主要病理原因為由壓力引起的心臟病發作，或是長期疲倦 所導致的中風。 IV Make up a cloze test with 5 questions under the topic “Learning English in the digital era” Each question should have four choices, (A), (B), (C), and (D), with one of them being the best answer. Remember to provide the answer key. (20 %)

V. In this section, make a reading test. First, condense the material provided into a passage of 300-350 words. Then, based on the rewritten passage, make up 4 reading comprehension questions. Each question should have four choices, (A), (B), (C), and (D), with one of them being the best answer. Remember to provide the answer key. (20%) Can twenty flunking students of varying intelligence raise their math and English a full year’s level in only thirty working days? Dr. Lloyd Homme, chief of a special educational “fix-it” laboratory in Albuquerque, New Mexico, said yes and put teams of behavioral scientist together with the flunking students to work on the problem. Any available technology could be used—teaching machines, programmed instruction, computer-assisted methods—to cram a year’s knowledge into the boys. Were the experiments a success? The scientists said yes but the students said no. When grades were measured using standardized tests under strict laboratory conditions, marks went up more than one year on the average. Meanwhile, back at the school, the students were still barely passing, at best. “The experiment was fine for the scientists. They proved their theory on paper and made a name for themselves, but most of us were still flunking in class,” remarked one seventeen-year-old. The only clue to the mystery was this common remark: “The teachers ignore us—they’ve got it in for us.” At first the scientists on the team thought the complaint was just sour grapes and told the boys to work harder. When grades still failed to rise, the scientists felt there might be some truth in what the young team members were saying. Not that teachers were to blame, necessarily, but there still might be some negative bias. “You should see what goes on in class!” said the boys. “The only thing to do was to take them up on it, go into the classroom with them and see what was holding back their grades,” said Dr. Homme. Hence, bearded behavioral scientists ended up in the back row of math and English classes and made observations about the behavior of students and teachers. Homme was surprised to discover that two simple actions made the difference. “With few exceptions, our students acted like dummies,” said Dr. Homme, “even though we knew they were ahead of the rest in knowledge. They were so used to playing the class idiot that they didn’t know how to show what they knew. Their eyes wandered, they appeared absent-minded or even belligerent. One or two read magazines hidden under their desks, thinking, most likely, that they already knew the classwork. They rarely volunteered and often had to have questions repeated because they weren’t listening. Teachers, on the other hand, did not trust our laboratory results. Nobody was going to tell them that ‘miracles’ could work on Sammy and Jose. In the eyes of teachers, students seemed to fall into three groups. We’ll call them: bright-eyes, scaredy-cats and dummies. Bright-eyes had perfected the trick of: 1. “eyeballing” the instructor at all times, even from the minute he entered the room. 2. never ducking their eyes away when the instructor glanced at them. 3. getting the instructor to call on them when they wanted without raising their hands. 4. even making the instructor go out of his way to call on someone else to “give others a chance” (especially useful when bright-eyes themselves are uncertain of the answer). 5. readily admitting ignorance so as not to bluff—but in such a way that it sounds as though ignorance is rare. 6. asking many questions. Scaredy-cats [the middle group]: 1. looked toward the instructor but were afraid to let him “catch their eyes.” 2. asked few questions and gave the impression of being “underachievers.” 3. appeared uninvolved and had to be “drawn out,” so they were likely to be criticized for “inadequate participation.” Dummies (no matter how much they really knew): 1. never looked at the instructor. 2. never asked questions. 3. were stubborn about volunteering information in class. To make matters worse, the tests in school were not standardized and not given nearly as frequently as those given in the laboratory. School test-scores were open to teacher bias. Classroom behavior of students counted a lot toward their class grades. There was no doubt that teachers were biased against the dummies. The scientists concluded that no matter how much knowledge a dummy gained on his own, his grades in school were unlikely to improve unless he could somehow change his image into a bright-eyes. This would mean . . . 1. Look the teacher in the eye. 2. Ask questions and volunteer answers (even if uncertain). “Teachers get teacher-training in how to play their roles. Why shouldn’t students get student-training in how to play bright-eyes?” asked Homme. Special training sessions were held at the laboratory. Dummies were drilled in eyeballing and hand-raising, which, simple as they sound, weren’t easy to do. “I felt so square I could hardly stand it,” complained one of the dummies. “That was at first. Later, when I saw others eyeballing and hand-raising and really learning more, I even moved my seat to the front. It flipped the teacher out of her skull. She couldn’t get over it.” Those who found eyeballing especially difficult were taught to look at the instructor’s mouth or the bridge of his nose. “Less threatening to the student,” explained Homme. “It seems less aggressive to them.” Unfortunately, not all of the dummies were able to pick up new habits during the limited training period. Some learned in the laboratory but couldn’t do it in the classroom. These became scaredy-cats—at least a step up. But for the majority, grades improved steadily once they got the hang of their new techniques. The students encouraged and helped each other to hand-raise and eyeball. Teachers’ comments reflected the improvement. “There is no doubt that student involvement was increased by the program and as a result grades went up.” By way of advice to others wishing to improve their own eyeballing and hand-raising, student Jose Martinez suggests: “Don’t try to do it all at once. You’ll shock the teacher and make it tough for yourself. Begin slowly. Work with a friend and help each other. Do it like a game. Like exercising with weights—it takes practice but it’s worth it.” Homme agrees. “In fact, results are guaranteed for life,” he says.

VI In this section, you will evaluate and grade a student’s composition on a given topic. You are expected to give the writing a holistic score (20~0) PLUS scores on four traits: Content (5~0), Organization & Transition (5~0), Grammar/Sentence Structure (5~0), and Word Usage/Spelling (5~0). In addition, please mark the student’s mistakes. At the end of the work, give the student your comments or feedback in a sentence or two. (20%)

Essay: Managing Anonymous Dissent      You recently assigned a complex writing project to your students. A few days later, you discover an anonymous post on a popular student social media forum criticizing the assignment as "burdensome" and "pointless," a sentiment that has gained significant support from other students. As their teacher, how would you address this situation professionally and pedagogically? Please write an essay to discuss your immediate response, communication strategy with the class, and reflective process regarding your instructional design.

2. Instructions:      Based on the following reading text about two museums, design a set of hybrid reading comprehension questions that incorporate multiple formats (e.g., multiple choice and short-answer items) for EFL high school students at the CEFR B2-C1 level. The test should include three parts: Part 1: Summary and Contextual Words • Write a short passage of no more than 80 words that conveys the same meaning as the original text. • Select two words from your passage and remove them to create two blanks. • The two words must appear in the original reading text. • This requires students to: locate two base words in the original text, change word forms appropriately, and fill the blanks so that the passage is grammatically and logically correct. * Provide your answers to the blanks.  Part 2: Phrasal Identification or Contextual Phrase Retrieval • Target a specific phrase in the original text. • Design one short-answer question beginning with "Which [grammatical phrase type or word count]...?" • The question requires students to identify or interpret a phrase based on context. * Provide your answer to the question. Part 3: Reading Comprehension Questions • Design two multiple-choice questions, with options from (A) to (D).  • Each must include 1 correct answer and 3 effective distractors. * Mark the correct answer to each question clearly. [Reading Text]       Throughout history, grand architecture has served as a symbol of national identity and power. Two of the most significant examples are the Louvre in Paris and the Palace Museum in Beijing. Both have undergone a remarkable transformation from exclusive royal residences into massive public museums. Today, these palace museums serve as essential gateways to understanding the art and cultural heritage of their respective nations. 

1. Instructions: The following is an oral dialogue offered by a TNSSH English teacher in the class activity for L4B3 Day of the Dead (Longteng Version). You are required to: 1. Summarize the content into a short passage within 180 words for a midterm exam meant for 11th - grade students, and create five blanks for cloze test.  2. Based on the original text, provide five multiple-choice reading comprehension questions with four options from (A) to (D), one correct answer, and three distractors.      Underline      the correct answer. 3. Based on the summary you write, concisely state 2 strategies that you can take in class to help TNSSH high school students at the CEFR B2 level to develop comparative writing techniques.

(三) 申論題 請以英文回答下列題目 1. How can English instruction be tailored to better prepare vocational high school students for their future careers? Provide specific examples.

3. Teachers at this independent school are creating customized interactive online resources, shared via iTunes U, allowing students to access lessons anytime and grow interest in online courses.

2. Havana, Cuba's capital, is undergoing a seismic economic shift, with expanding private enterprises and tourism, as locals proudly share their culture with visitors and expats.

 1. In many leading coffee cities, cafés are not just for drinks but hubs of culture and conversation, shaped by unique traditions and a shared passion for coffee craftsmanship.

115年 - 115-1 國立臺南第二高級中學_教師甄選試題︰英文科#139242

115年 - 115 臺北市立內湖高級工業職業學校_正式教師甄選試題：應英科#139220

115年 - 115 新北市公立高級中等學校_教師聯合甄選試題：英文科#139218

115年 - 115 臺北市立陽明高級中學正式教師甄選試題：高中英文科#139217

115年 - 115-1 國立頭城高級家事商業職業學校_教師甄選試題：英文科#139159

115年 - 115-1 國立竹東高級中學_教師甄試試題：英文科#139071

115年 - 115 國立高科實驗高級中等學校_專任教師甄選_國小部：英語文領域專長#139004

115年 - 115 國立高科實驗高級中等學校_專任教師甄選_國中部：語文領域英語文專長#138933

115年 - 115-1 國立彰化女子高級中學_教師甄選試題：英文科#138758

115年 - 115-1 臺南市立沙崙國際高級中等學校_教師甄選試題︰英文科#138687