阿摩線上測驗
登入
首頁
> 最新資料
最新資料
瀏覽最新的試卷、試題和詳解,掌握最新考試資訊
最新科目
轉學考-工程力學
研究所、轉學考(插大)◆營建管理
轉學考-測量學
最新試卷
115年 - 115 專技高考_牙體技術師:牙體解剖形態雕刻#142867(2題)
115年 - 115 專技高考_語言治療師:嗓音與吞嚥障礙學#142866(50題)
115年 - 115 專技高考_語言治療師:兒童語言障礙學#142865(50題)
115年 - 115 專技高考_法醫師:法醫病理與解剖學#142864(43題)
115年 - 115-2 專技高考_營養師:生理學與生物化學#142863(50題)
115年 - 115-2 專技高考_護理師:基礎醫學(包括解剖學、生理學、病理學、藥理學、微生物學與免疫學)#142862(50題)
115年 - 115 專技高考_語言治療師:溝通障礙總論(包括專業倫理)#142861(50題)
115年 - 115-2 專技高考_護理師:精神科與社區衛生護理學#142860(50題)
115年 - 115-2 專技高考_公共衛生師:生物統計學#142859(43題)
115年 - 115 專技高考_法醫師:臨床法醫學#142858(43題)
最新試題
119. 將某額定為 220 伏特、1000 瓦特之電熱器,以 110 伏特的電源供電,若要產生 75000 焦耳熱量,需供電多少分鐘? 初等考 114 (A)2.5 (B)5 (C)7.5 (D)10
118. 2 歐姆電阻所消耗的功率為 18 瓦特,其通過之電流為何? 初等考 114 (A)1 安培 (B)2 安培 (C)3 安培 (D)4 安培
117. 電熱器為 20Ω,連接至 110V 的電壓源,若連續使用 24 個小時,試求總消耗電量為多少度﹖ 台鐵 113 (A)5.53 度 (B)14.52 度 (C)28 度 (D)132 度
最新申論題
四、”Learning in the context of educating is a process under the deliberate control of the learner” 試詮釋其意義。(25分)
三、「子日:愛之,能勿勞乎?忠焉,能勿誨乎?」《論語.憲問》試評述這句話的教育涵義。(25分)
二、如果我們肯定教育工作是一種專業,那麼您認為教學生涯是一種平淡平實的生涯,還是一種繽紛璀璨、多采多姿的生涯?為什麼?(25分)
最新課程
1231231231
講師:
陳耘得
簡介:
1231231231
11111
講師:
陳耘得
簡介:
22222
11111222
講師:
陳耘得
簡介:
222223333
最新主題筆記
協調與恆定性
課程:
國中自然會考總複習
章節:
國一生物
生殖與遺傳
課程:
國中自然會考總複習
章節:
國一生物
地球上生物
課程:
國中自然會考總複習
章節:
國一生物
最新討論
48.下列有關利尿劑triamterene與amiloride的結構比較,何者錯誤? (A)triamterene主結構為pteridine (B)兩者具相同氮原子數量 (C)triamterene鹼性較強 (D)amiloride主結構為aminopyrazine
58.下列何者為spironolactone的主要活性代謝產物? (A)(B)(C)(D)
22. 下列正確中心線圓弧尺度標註為? (A) (B) (C) (D) 。
23. 以圓周來定孔的中心,下列正確的為: (A) (B) (C) (D) 。
一、如圖所示,一個質量為 m、半徑為 r 的圓柱體靜止於一個平面上,質心為 G、接觸點為 C,若平面的傾斜角增至θ ,該圓柱體開始向下滾動,但不發生滑動。圓柱體相對於質心 G 的質量轉動慣量(mass moment of inertia) 為= mr2/ 2,重力加速度設 g。請計算圓柱體的瞬間直線加速度及角加 速度。(25 分)
四、英文教案(25 分) 請閱讀以下的教案說明及英文閱讀文本:Now, imagine that you are going to teach 11th graders “How to Read and Write a Petition”. Your task is to help your students understand the core concept of this text and choose either side to fight for via a petition. Thus, you need to design a feasible 3-period lesson plan on reading and writing a petition, including learning objectives, instructional methods, assignments and assessments, and teaching procedures. Should Cities Limit the Number of Tourists? Tourism brings significant economic benefits to many cities. It creates jobs, supports local businesses, and allows people from different cultures to learn from one another. However, as international travel becomes more affordable, some popular destinations have begun to experience “overtourism.” This has led to a debate about whether governments should place limits on the number of visitors. Those who support tourist limits argue that cities have a responsibility to protect their residents’ quality of life. In many destinations, housing prices have increased because apartments are being converted into short-term rentals for visitors. Crowded streets, long lines at public transportation stations, and increased noise can make daily life difficult for local people. Environmental damage is another concern. Large numbers of tourists produce more waste, consume more water, and place additional pressure on historical sites and natural attractions. On the other hand, critics believe that limiting tourism could harm the economy. Hotels, restaurants, transportation services, and souvenir shops often depend heavily on visitors. A sudden reduction in tourist numbers could lead to job losses and lower tax revenues. Furthermore, some argue that instead of restricting tourism, governments should invest in better infrastructure, improve public transportation, and encourage tourists to visit less crowded areas. A balanced approach may offer the best solution. Rather than imposing strict limits, cities could introduce reservation systems for popular attractions, promote off- season travel, and charge environmental fees that help fund conservation projects. At the same time, local communities should be involved in tourism planning to ensure that economic growth does not come at the expense of residents' well-being. Ultimately, tourism should benefit both visitors and local people. The challenge is not simply attracting more tourists but managing tourism in a way that is sustainable for future generations.