最新資料

醫化學

指紋學

比較政治

115年 - 115 高等考試_二級_醫學工程：生理學#145798(4題)

115年 - 115 高等考試_二級_動物技術：家畜生理學與解剖學#145797(6題)

115年 - 115 高等考試_二級_養殖技術：飼料營養學研究#145796(5題)

115年 - 115 高等考試_二級_各類科：國文（作文）#145795(2題)

115年 - 115 高等考試_二級_園藝：園藝作物育種學與園藝作物生理學#145794(8題)

115年 - 115 高等考試_二級_動物技術：畜產品加工與利用#145793(4題)

115年 - 115 高等考試_二級_養殖技術：養殖遺傳育種學研究#145792(4題)

115年 - 115 高等考試_二級_水產資源：水產資源學特論#145791(12題)

115年 - 115 高等考試_二級_水產資源：漁業技術研究#145790(4題)

115年 - 115 高等考試_二級_都市計畫技術：國土、區域與都市空間資訊理論與實務#145789(4題)

119. 將某額定為 220 伏特、1000 瓦特之電熱器，以 110 伏特的電源供電，若要產生 75000 焦耳熱量，需供電多少分鐘？ 初等考 114 (A)2.5 (B)5 (C)7.5 (D)10

118. 2 歐姆電阻所消耗的功率為 18 瓦特，其通過之電流為何？ 初等考 114 (A)1 安培　(B)2 安培　(C)3 安培　(D)4 安培

117. 電熱器為 20Ω，連接至 110V 的電壓源，若連續使用 24 個小時，試求總消耗電量為多少度﹖ 台鐵 113 (A)5.53 度　(B)14.52 度　(C)28 度　(D)132 度

四、”Learning in the context of educating is a process under the deliberate control of the learner” 試詮釋其意義。(２５分)

三、「子日：愛之，能勿勞乎？忠焉，能勿誨乎？」《論語．憲問》試評述這句話的教育涵義。(２５分)

二、如果我們肯定教育工作是一種專業，那麼您認為教學生涯是一種平淡平實的生涯，還是一種繽紛璀璨、多采多姿的生涯？為什麼？(２５分)

1231231231455555

講師：陳耘得

簡介：1231231231qweqweqwewqeqwe

這是課程名稱

講師：陳耘得

簡介：這是課程描述

國中國文

講師：【站僕】摩檸Morning.

簡介：國中國文

但

描述：但

但

描述：但

筆順基本原則

描述：筆順基本原則

48.下列有關利尿劑triamterene與amiloride的結構比較，何者錯誤？ (A)triamterene主結構為pteridine (B)兩者具相同氮原子數量 (C)triamterene鹼性較強 (D)amiloride主結構為aminopyrazine

58.下列何者為spironolactone的主要活性代謝產物？ (A)(B)(C)(D)

21. 何種材質較適合微波加熱使用的食品包裝? (A) (B) (C) (D) 。

22. 下列正確中心線圓弧尺度標註為? (A) (B) (C) (D) 。

一、如圖所示，一個質量為 m、半徑為 r 的圓柱體靜止於一個平面上，質心為 G、接觸點為 C，若平面的傾斜角增至θ ，該圓柱體開始向下滾動，但不發生滑動。圓柱體相對於質心 G 的質量轉動慣量（mass moment of inertia） 為= mr2/ 2，重力加速度設 g。請計算圓柱體的瞬間直線加速度及角加 速度。（25 分）

四、英文教案(25 分) 請閱讀以下的教案說明及英文閱讀文本：Now, imagine that you are going to teach 11th graders “How to Read and Write a Petition”. Your task is to help your students understand the core concept of this text and choose either side to fight for via a petition. Thus, you need to design a feasible 3-period lesson plan on reading and writing a petition, including learning objectives, instructional methods, assignments and assessments, and teaching procedures. Should Cities Limit the Number of Tourists? Tourism brings significant economic benefits to many cities. It creates jobs, supports local businesses, and allows people from different cultures to learn from one another. However, as international travel becomes more affordable, some popular destinations have begun to experience “overtourism.” This has led to a debate about whether governments should place limits on the number of visitors. Those who support tourist limits argue that cities have a responsibility to protect their residents’ quality of life. In many destinations, housing prices have increased because apartments are being converted into short-term rentals for visitors. Crowded streets, long lines at public transportation stations, and increased noise can make daily life difficult for local people. Environmental damage is another concern. Large numbers of tourists produce more waste, consume more water, and place additional pressure on historical sites and natural attractions. On the other hand, critics believe that limiting tourism could harm the economy. Hotels, restaurants, transportation services, and souvenir shops often depend heavily on visitors. A sudden reduction in tourist numbers could lead to job losses and lower tax revenues. Furthermore, some argue that instead of restricting tourism, governments should invest in better infrastructure, improve public transportation, and encourage tourists to visit less crowded areas. A balanced approach may offer the best solution. Rather than imposing strict limits, cities could introduce reservation systems for popular attractions, promote off- season travel, and charge environmental fees that help fund conservation projects. At the same time, local communities should be involved in tourism planning to ensure that economic growth does not come at the expense of residents' well-being. Ultimately, tourism should benefit both visitors and local people. The challenge is not simply attracting more tourists but managing tourism in a way that is sustainable for future generations.