×
載入中..請稍候..
【系統公告】目前街口支付付款管道異常中,正在修復階段,請各位摩友購買阿摩商品時,改用其它付款管道,造成大家的不便,真的非常抱歉。
我想開課
●
公告
搜尋
回報
註冊
登入
功能列表
課程筆記
循序
試卷
寫作批改
NEW!
錯題
自由
考試秘書
考試總覽
近期刊誤
最近測驗
未完成試卷
冠軍賽
精熟測驗
各科能力分析
打氣工具
私人筆記
打卡
考用行事曆
我上傳的試卷
收錄的題目
按讚的題目
發表的討論
查單字
收錄的試卷
好友
加值服務
商城
鑽石兌換商城
NEW!
加值訂單查詢
VIP專區
VIP與詳解卡管理
VIP功能介紹
下載題庫專區
下載題庫
試題查詢
序號兌換
活動
密技
剛剛測驗
張芷榛
25 秒前
4分
Sam P..
57 秒前
100分
ovo
1 分鐘前
12分
周至善
1 分鐘前
100分
Zuo
1 分鐘前
100分
幸運日記
輔導與諮商
、
關於氣喘患者,下列何..
、
警報系統
、
不動產營業員
、
教育理念與ㄕˊㄨ
、
微生物
、
艾瑞克森的觀點
、
理性決策理論
、
行政命令經立法院各該..
、
119965
、
熱門科目
文書處理及檔案管理測驗題庫彙編
色彩學概要測驗題庫彙編
工藝概論(琺瑯、金 工、工藝美學等)測驗題庫彙編
高職數學測驗題庫彙編
廢水處理控制設備測驗題庫彙編
最新試題
III. Essay Questions: Read the news from Washington, D.C., in the U.S. (50%) The Supreme Court recently heard a significant case regarding student speech, involving 14-year- old Brandi Levy, whose profanity-laced Snapchat post led to her suspension from the cheerleading team at her Pennsylvania high school. The case raises the question of whether public schools can discipline students for off-campus speech. The landmark Tinker v. Des Moines ruling in 1969 established that students do not lose their constitutional rights to freedom of speech at school. However, the contours of this decision have been the subject of ongoing debate. Levy's case differs from Tinker in that it lacks the lofty motives of a protest against war. Rather, it represents teenage frustration. Levy expressed her anger at being kept on the junior varsity cheerleading squad for another year by posting profane words and gestures on Snapchat. Her coaches saw the post and suspended her from the team for a year. Levy's parents filed a federal lawsuit, arguing that her suspension violated her constitutional speech rights. Lower courts agreed with Levy and restored her to the cheerleading team, stating that Tinker does not apply to off-campus speech. The 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals clarified that it was yet to address the First Amendment implications of off-campus speech involving threats of violence or harassment. However, the school district, education groups, the Biden administration, and anti-bullying organizations argued that the appeals court's decision went too far. They emphasized that public schools should be able to discipline students for off-campus speech, depending on the circumstances. While the school district claimed that its approach allows for addressing disruptive speech and protecting students' rights, critics argue that such an approach would grant schools excessive power to monitor and regulate students' speech beyond school grounds. The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), representing Levy, contended that this would stifle students' ability to express frustration and could lead to the regulation of political and religious speech. Levy's case has garnered support from an unlikely alliance of conservative and liberal interest groups, who highlight the dangers of expanding school regulation of off-campus speech. The Alliance Defending Freedom and Christian Legal Society caution against the regulation of religious speech, which they believe provokes debate and inflames passions. Even Mary Beth and John Tinker, central figures in the 1969 case, expressed support for Levy, suggesting that their protest would have included a digital social media component. Though Levy's speech may not be considered politically or religiously important, her case has the potential to shape the legal understanding of student speech rights. She aims to highlight that students should not face punishment for expressing their feelings and thoughts. The Supreme Court's ruling in this case will likely have far-reaching implications for student speech and the regulation of online behavior in the internet age. Adapted from https:/newsela.com/read/student-free-speech-supreme-court/id/2001020589/
4. Based on the revised reading article, design a 15-minute reading activity. (15%) - Explain your teaching steps, including your instructional language (how you instruct students), target language (what you want students to learn), and assessment (how you examine learning effectiveness). - Clarify what pedagogies you apply for your teaching plan, and the reason you choose it/them.
3. According to Bloom's taxonomy, come up with 1 critical high-order thinking question to guide students to discuss. Also, explain what you want students to learn from your questions. (10%)
10. Ms. Anderson divides the students into small groups and assigns each group a different city as their destination. What they will research and plan is a day trip itinerary, considering transportation, sightseeing spots, dining options, and any additional information necessary to make the trip successful. Providing the students with clear instructions, Ms. Anderson encourages them to communicate, and use their English skills effectively to complete the assignment. As the students begin their discussion, she observes their interactions, offers language input when necessary, and encourages them to reflect on their progress. After the allotted time, each group presents their day trip itinerary to the class...
Which of the following methodology is NOT applied by Ms. Anderson? (A) Task-based Instruction (B) Collaborative Learning (C) Communicative Teaching (D) Suggestopedia
9. Doctors said that the conventional medicine can only _______ the condition, but it cannot cure them for good. (A) captivate (B) extirpate (C) palliate (D) recapitulate
8. Students are supposed to study ways to tackle academic _______ as they enter high school. (A) cache (B) rigor (C) alloy (D) brawn
最新情報
【街口支付異常】
組合包轉讓
台北市及新北市數學教甄詳解分享~~~正哥愛數學
最新試卷
112 新竹縣立勝利國民中學_正式教師甄選初試試題:英語科
105 國立臺灣師範大學_轉學生招生考試試題_數學系二年級:微積分
112 中央銀行所屬中央印製廠、中央造幣廠_新進人員聯合甄試試題_印製技術員/機械技術員:機械概論
環境用藥管理相關法規及實務練習題
111E-09機電班
環境用藥管理相關法規及實務練習題 151-209
環境用藥管理相關法規及實務練習題 101-150
環境用藥管理相關法規及實務練習題 51-100
商業英文規劃師認證(進階BEP)學科題庫451-500
商業英文規劃師認證(進階BEP)學科題庫401-450
最新行事曆
普考考公職考試日
普考報名日
地方特考報名
司法五等庭務員考試
【2024/06/08冠軍賽 】科目:初等/五等/佐級◆行政法大意(包含行政程序法等)
其他資訊
更多資訊
錯在阿摩,贏在考場
給我們一個讚,讓我們可以做的更好!
登入後,將不會看到此視窗