I. Test-making
Please rewrite the following passage into a text of 250-300 words for 12th graders of National Chiayi Senior High School , and devise 4 mixed questions (混合題) following the style and focus of General Scholastic Ability Test (大學學科能力 測驗) based on your text, with the correct answers provided .
Text:
The advent of generative AI has ushered in a disquieting new era of digital appropriation, wherein the boundaries between homage and theft have grown dangerously porous. Nowhere is this more evident than in the proliferation of AI-generated images mimicking the style of Studio Ghibli—an animation house globally esteemed for its meticulously hand-drawn visuals, ecological sensibility, and cultural depth. What is often lauded as technological ingenuity is, in this case, a disingenuous reproduction that commodifies artistic identity under the guise of democratized creativity.
At the heart of this issue lies the unregulated data harvesting that fuels most generative AI models. These systems are trained on sprawling datasets that frequently include copyrighted images scraped without consent. In replicating Ghibli’s visual lexicon, AI tools effectively cannibalize decades of artistic labor, abstracting it into a soulless aesthetic algorithm. The resulting images are not tributes but sterile imitations—devoid of narrative coherence, emotional resonance, or cultural rootedness. This process flattens artistic complexity into algorithmic pastiche, reducing a rich visual tradition into a prompt-based gimmick.
The ethical lapse extends beyond the technology itself to the platforms and users who exploit these systems for engagement, novelty, or clout. What they call "accessibility" is in fact a veiled form of intellectual exploitation, in which cultural and creative labor is mined without accountability. The platforms profiting from this trend rarely offer mechanisms for attribution, compensation, or opt-outs for creators, revealing a willful disregard for artistic rights in pursuit of scale and virality.
Furthermore, the aesthetic integrity of Ghibli’s work is inseparable from its cultural and philosophical origins—especially its grounding in Shinto animism, environmental ethics, and Japanese storytelling traditions. To reduce this nuanced heritage to mere stylistic tropes is to enact a form of cultural erasure. The images may look Ghibli-esque, but they are stripped of the ethos and intentionality that give the originals their meaning. They are simulations devoid of spirit—digital husks mimicking form without understanding function.
Even more troubling is the impact on emerging artists who engage in sincere, interpretive dialogue with Studio Ghibli’s legacy. These individuals study, evolve, and innovate upon that aesthetic, often creating transformative works that expand the tradition rather than dilute it. In contrast, AI-generated facsimiles flood the creative landscape with undifferentiated content,eroding the visibility of authentic voices and normalizing a culture of effortless reproduction over earned expression.
The unchecked normalization of AI-generated art styled after Studio Ghibli is symptomatic of a larger failure to impose ethical constraints on technological advancement. Until robust regulatory frameworks and artist protections are established, we risk not only undermining the sanctity of creative labor but also forfeiting the very notion of artistic authorship. In the race toward frictionless creation, we must not lose sight of the irreplaceable value of human imagination, context, and care.