阿摩線上測驗 登入

114年 - [非官方正解]114-1 新竹市立建功高中_正式教師甄選試題:高中英文#126076

科目:教甄◆英文科 | 年份:114年 | 選擇題數:15 | 申論題數:8

試卷資訊

所屬科目:教甄◆英文科

選擇題 (15)

申論題 (8)

II. Examination Questions Design
( A ) Rewrite the passage in approximately 250 words, keeping the main ideas and key points while making it appropriate for 11th -grade students. Then, create a cloze test with five multiple-choice questions, each with four answer choices. Provide the correct answer for each question.
        The notion that consuming coffee immediately upon waking is detrimental has gained significant traction on social media. Wellness advocates and influencers often recommend delaying caffeine intake by 90 to 120 minutes after waking to mitigate the purported risks of an afternoon energy slump and enhance sleep quality. This practice is sometimes hailed as a transformative strategy for optimizing energy levels. However, it is essential to scrutinize these claims through the lens of scientific evidence.
        To critically evaluate this assertion, it is crucial to comprehend the physiological mechanisms underlying caffeine's effects on the human body. Throughout the day, the brain synthesizes adenosine, a neurotransmitter that induces somnolence by binding to specific receptors. Caffeine functions as an adenosine receptor antagonist, thereby enhancing alertness by blocking these receptors.
        Notably, caffeine's effects are not instantaneous. Dr. Michael Grandner, Director of the Sleep and Health Research Program at the University of Arizona, notes that it typically requires 20 to 30 minutes for caffeine to reach the brain and exert its effects. The duration of these effects varies significantly among individuals, primarily due to genetic variability in caffeine metabolism.
        One rationale for postponing caffeine consumption is predicated on the fluctuations in adenosine levels. Given that adenosine concentrations naturally diminish during sleep, they are at their nadir upon waking. The theoretical underpinning is that consuming coffee immediately after waking may yield a less pronounced stimulatory effect compared to waiting until adenosine levels have increased.
        Dr. Grandner acknowledges the validity of this rationale and personally adopts a delay of 30 to 60 minutes before consuming his first cup of coffee. However, it is crucial to note that there is no universally accepted scientific consensus regarding the optimal timing for caffeine intake, as individual preferences play a significant role. Another potential justification for delaying caffeine intake is for individuals who limit themselves to a single cup per day. By postponing consumption until later in the morning, they may potentially prolong the effects of caffeine into the afternoon, thereby mitigating the likelihood of a mid-day energy decline.
        In reality, there is a dearth of robust scientific evidence to support the notion that consuming coffee immediately upon waking is detrimental or that delaying it confers substantial benefits. Dr. Marilyn Cornelis, a prominent caffeine researcher at Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, underscores that caffeine's effects are highly variable among individuals, with some metabolizing it rapidly and others experiencing more prolonged effects.
        For individuals experiencing afternoon energy fluctuations, adjusting caffeine intake may be beneficial, but delaying morning coffee consumption is not the sole solution. Factors such as sleep quality, dietary habits, and hydration status play a more significant role in maintaining consistent energy levels throughout the day.
       The notion that consuming coffee immediately upon waking is inherently detrimental is more akin to a social media trend than a scientifically substantiated fact. While delaying caffeine intake may be beneficial for certain individuals, it is not a universally applicable principle. If you derive satisfaction from your morning coffee immediately upon waking, there is no compelling scientific rationale to alter this routine.

( B ) Design five reading comprehension questions based on the following passage. Include three multiple-choice questions and two competency-based questions.Provide the correct answer for each question.
        Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie, as a storyteller, emphasizes the danger of the single story through personal anecdotes. Growing up in Nigeria, her early reading material consisted mainly of British and American children’s books. Consequently, her early writing featured white, blue-eyed characters who played in the snow and talked about the weather, despite her Nigerian context where such experiences were absent. This illustrated how impressionable children are to stories, leading her to believe that books inherently had to be about foreign experiences.
         However, this perception changed when she discovered African literature by authors like Chinua Achebe. This revelation reshaped her understanding of storytelling, showing her that people like her could also exist in literature. It saved her from having a single story of what books could be.
        Adichie’s awareness of the single story extended beyond literature to real-life experiences. She recalls the story of their houseboy, Fide, whose family was described only as poor. This limited perspective led her to see them solely through the lens of poverty. However, her assumptions were challenged when she saw a beautifully crafted basket made by Fide’s brother. This moment revealed a hidden dimension of their lives, showing her that people are always more than a single narrative.
        Her understanding deepened further when she moved to the U.S. for university. There, she encountered another single story— this time about Africa. Her American roommate assumed Africa was a place of catastrophe, filled with pitiable and incomprehensible people. This singular narrative ignored the continent’s complexity, diversity, and normalcy. Adichie traced the roots of this misrepresentation back to Western literature, citing a 1561 account that depicted Africans as monstrous beings. Such historical portrayals laid the foundation for enduring negative stereotypes.
        Recognizing the dangers of a single story, Adichie also reflects on her own biases. She acknowledges that she, too, once held a single story about Mexicans, shaped by the narratives in U.S. media. This self-awareness underscores how easily people, regardless of background, can fall into the trap of oversimplification. The repetition of a single narrative reduces a group to a single characteristic, stripping them of their complexity and humanity.
        The concept of "nkali," an Igbo word meaning “to be greater than another,” highlights how power determines which stories are told, how they are framed, and whose voices are amplified. Those with the power to control narratives can dictate how entire groups are perceived, often reinforcing imbalances and dispossessing people of their agency.
        However, Adichie clarifies that stereotypes are not necessarily false but incomplete. They flatten experiences, making one perspective the only perspective. To challenge this, she urges people to engage with multiple narratives. Only by listening to a diversity of voices can we avoid robbing others of dignity and recognize our shared humanity. This idea of "a balance of stories" is crucial in shaping a more just and accurate understanding of the world.
         To illustrate this, Adichie highlights the richness of Nigerian society—its thriving publishing industry, engaged readership, influential media personalities, medical advancements, vibrant music scene, legal activism, booming Nollywood film industry, and ambitious entrepreneurs. These examples counter the limited and often negative portrayal of Nigeria, revealing a dynamic and multifaceted reality.
         Ultimately, Adichie emphasizes that stories hold immense power—they can dispossess and malign, but they can also empower and humanize. Rejecting the single story allows us to reclaim a broader, more truthful vision of the world. By embracing the diversity of experiences, we restore complexity and, in Adichie’s words, regain a kind of paradise.