三、按非訟事件法第 35 條之 3 第 1 項規定：「聲請人與相對人就得處分之事項成立和解者，於作成和解筆錄時，發生與本案確定裁定同一之效力。」。茲甲持在外國法院就得處分事項所成立之非訟事件和解筆錄，主張該等和解筆錄內容，並無非訟事件法第 49 條所定得不認其效力之情形，與確定裁判有同一效力，向我國法院聲請判決許可其執行。請問：其主張有無理由？請詳予說明。（25 分）

一、英翻中：請將下列英文翻譯成中文。（20 分） Though a person may be eligible to hold the office of notary, the person may be disqualified to act in certain cases by reason of having an interest in the case. To state the rule broadly: if the notary is a party to or directly and pecuniarily interested in the transaction, the person is not capable of acting in that case. For example, a husband could not notarize his wife’s signature on a deed if they are purchasing the property together. Both husband and wife receive the same benefit from the purchase, which creates a conflict of interest should the husband attempt a notarization for his wife.

相關申論題

相關試卷